Fungi 362,933 claims

Fungal pathogens (wilts, rusts, smuts, leaf spots, root and wood rots), mycorrhizal and endophytic symbionts, and biocontrol fungi such as Trichoderma. 519 families, 7,893 taxa.

519 entries, A to Z

Acaulosporaceae856 claims · 508 papersAcrocalymmaceae63 claims · 17 papersAcrogenosporaceae3 claims · 1 paperAcrospermaceae12 claims · 5 papersAdustoporiaceae32 claims · 15 papersAgaricaceae92 claims · 40 papersAigialaceae1 claim · 1 paperAjellomycetaceae4 claims · 4 papersAlbatrellaceae4 claims · 1 paperAmanitaceae190 claims · 83 papersAmbisporaceae40 claims · 27 papersAmniculicolaceae2 claims · 2 papersAmorosiaceae5 claims · 2 papersAmphisphaeriaceae67 claims · 38 papersAmylocorticiaceae3,852 claims · 1,186 papersAnnulatascaceae1 claim · 1 paperAnteagloniaceae2 claims · 2 papersAnthracoideaceae26 claims · 12 papersApiosporaceae796 claims · 296 papersAplosporellaceae16 claims · 6 papersApoharknessiaceae17 claims · 5 papersArachnomycetaceae1 claim · 1 paperArchaeorhizomycetaceae11 claims · 9 papersArchaeosporaceae41 claims · 29 papersArthopyreniaceae1 claim · 1 paperArthrodermataceae110 claims · 69 papersAscobolaceae3 claims · 2 papersAscodesmidaceae3 claims · 2 papersAscodichaenaceae1 claim · 1 paperAscoideaceae3 claims · 1 paperAscosphaeraceae4 claims · 2 papersAspergillaceae18,174 claims · 6,912 papersAsproinocybaceae1 claim · 1 paperAsterinaceae15 claims · 12 papersAsterosporiaceae1 claim · 1 paperAsterotexaceae7 claims · 1 paperAstraeaceae25 claims · 8 papersAstrosphaeriellaceae1 claim · 1 paperAtheliaceae167 claims · 92 papersAuriculariaceae7 claims · 7 papersAustraliascaceae16 claims · 5 papersBaeomycetaceae1 claim · 1 paperBambusicolaceae11 claims · 2 papersBarrmaeliaceae1 claim · 1 paperBatkoaceae3 claims · 2 papersBeltraniaceae20 claims · 8 papersBionectriaceae1,122 claims · 421 papersBlastocladiaceae1 claim · 1 paperBolbitiaceae17 claims · 10 papersBoletaceae193 claims · 76 papersBoletinellaceae40 claims · 12 papersBondarzewiaceae1,495 claims · 409 papersBotryobasidiaceae6 claims · 2 papersBotryosphaeriaceae11,685 claims · 3,689 papersBrachybasidiaceae22 claims · 8 papersBryoglossaceae3 claims · 2 papersBulleraceae1 claim · 1 paperBulleribasidiaceae44 claims · 34 papersCalcarisporiellaceae1 claim · 1 paperCaliciaceae3 claims · 3 papersCallistosporiaceae1 claim · 1 paperCaloscyphaceae8 claims · 2 papersCalosphaeriaceae32 claims · 9 papersCalostomataceae3 claims · 1 paperCampanellaceae16 claims · 3 papersCapnodiaceae38 claims · 19 papersCatenariaceae1 claim · 1 paperCelotheliaceae4 claims · 1 paperCenangiaceae80 claims · 30 papersCephaloascaceae1 claim · 1 paperCephalothecaceae8 claims · 5 papersCeraceosoraceae1 claim · 1 paperCeratobasidiaceae14,215 claims · 5,175 papersCeratocystidaceae1,483 claims · 490 papersCeratosphaeriaceae1 claim · 1 paperCeratostomataceae35 claims · 20 papersCerrenaceae15 claims · 9 papersChaetomellaceae94 claims · 28 papersChaetomiaceae692 claims · 357 papersChaetosphaeriaceae46 claims · 25 papersChaetothyriaceae4 claims · 3 papersChoanephoraceae257 claims · 64 papersChrysotrichaceae1 claim · 1 paperChrysozymaceae6 claims · 4 papersCintractiaceae3 claims · 1 paperCintractiellaceae2 claims · 1 paperCladoniaceae10 claims · 6 papersCladosporiaceae1,603 claims · 880 papersClathraceae1 claim · 1 paperClavariaceae6 claims · 5 papersClavariadelphaceae1 claim · 1 paperClavicipitaceae3,930 claims · 1,289 papersClimacocystaceae2 claims · 2 papersClitocybaceae23 claims · 11 papersCoccocarpiaceae2 claims · 2 papersCoccodiniaceae8 claims · 7 papersColacogloeaceae1 claim · 1 paperColeosporiaceae1,098 claims · 349 papersCollemataceae1 claim · 1 paperConidiobolaceae3 claims · 3 papersConiochaetaceae29 claims · 22 papersConiocybaceae3 claims · 3 papersConiophoraceae74 claims · 24 papersConiothyriaceae72 claims · 25 papersConlariaceae1 claim · 1 paperCordanaceae13 claims · 5 papersCordycipitaceae3,102 claims · 1,266 papersCorticiaceae435 claims · 153 papersCortinariaceae99 claims · 74 papersCoryneaceae4 claims · 4 papersCoryneliaceae15 claims · 6 papersCorynesporascaceae1,103 claims · 319 papersCrossopsoraceae94 claims · 30 papersCryphonectriaceae1,013 claims · 321 papersCryptobasidiaceae9 claims · 4 papersCryptococcaceae64 claims · 33 papersCucurbitariaceae45 claims · 19 papersCunninghamellaceae40 claims · 15 papersCylindrosympodiaceae2 claims · 2 papersCyphellaceae130 claims · 50 papersCyphellophoraceae10 claims · 10 papersCystobasidiaceae19 claims · 5 papersCystofilobasidiaceae4 claims · 4 papersCystostereaceae7 claims · 3 papersCytosporaceae1,145 claims · 367 papersCyttariaceae11 claims · 5 papersDacrymycetaceae4 claims · 3 papersDebaryomycetaceae1,267 claims · 784 papersDensosporaceae4 claims · 3 papersDermateaceae481 claims · 184 papersDiaporthaceae3,994 claims · 1,351 papersDiatrypaceae418 claims · 148 papersDictyosporiaceae17 claims · 4 papersDidymellaceae6,010 claims · 2,068 papersDidymosphaeriaceae410 claims · 159 papersDipodascaceae425 claims · 153 papersDiscinaceae4 claims · 3 papersDiscinellaceae21 claims · 6 papersDissoconiaceae17 claims · 11 papersDiversisporaceae675 claims · 250 papersDoassansiaceae6 claims · 1 paperDothideaceae42 claims · 20 papersDothioraceae63 claims · 33 papersDrepanopezizaceae795 claims · 274 papersDwiroopaceae7 claims · 1 paperEballistraceae5 claims · 5 papersEchinodontiaceae1 claim · 1 paperElaphomycetaceae16 claims · 9 papersElsinoaceae341 claims · 122 papersEndogonaceae121 claims · 37 papersEntolomataceae25 claims · 10 papersEntomophthoraceae77 claims · 37 papersEntorrhizaceae12 claims · 2 papersEntrophosporaceae532 claims · 263 papersEntylomataceae68 claims · 26 papersEocronartiaceae7 claims · 4 papersEpibryaceae1 claim · 1 paperErysiphaceae12,591 claims · 4,199 papersErythrobasidiaceae2 claims · 2 papersExidiaceae4 claims · 4 papersExobasidiaceae251 claims · 88 papersFibroporiaceae6 claims · 2 papersFilobasidiaceae43 claims · 30 papersFistulinaceae9 claims · 5 papersFloromycetaceae15 claims · 6 papersFomitopsidaceae93 claims · 45 papersGalerinaceae2 claims · 2 papersGeastraceae5 claims · 3 papersGelatinodiscaceae27 claims · 8 papersGelatoporiaceae28 claims · 12 papersGeminibasidiaceae2 claims · 2 papersGeoglossaceae1 claim · 1 paperGeomoriaceae2 claims · 1 paperGeosiphonaceae2 claims · 2 papersGigasporaceae1,371 claims · 661 papersGjaerumiaceae4 claims · 2 papersGloeophyllaceae29 claims · 20 papersGlomeraceae11,998 claims · 4,310 papersGlomerellaceae19,163 claims · 5,823 papersGlomosporiaceae51 claims · 20 papersGloniaceae295 claims · 165 papersGnomoniaceae532 claims · 185 papersGodroniaceae233 claims · 66 papersGolubeviaceae28 claims · 8 papersGomphaceae14 claims · 6 papersGomphidiaceae10 claims · 4 papersGondwanamycetaceae7 claims · 4 papersGraphidaceae2 claims · 1 paperGraphiolaceae34 claims · 11 papersGrifolaceae1 claim · 1 paperGymnoascaceae5 claims · 3 papersGymnosporangiaceae285 claims · 85 papersGyrodontaceae12 claims · 8 papersHalosphaeriaceae6 claims · 4 papersHamatocanthoscyphaceae20 claims · 11 papersHarknessiaceae1 claim · 1 paperHelicobasidiaceae84 claims · 31 papersHelicocephalidaceae1 claim · 1 paperHelotiaceae300 claims · 109 papersHelvellaceae9 claims · 2 papersHemipholiotaceae4 claims · 3 papersHericiaceae6 claims · 2 papersHerpotrichiellaceae203 claims · 88 papersHeterosphaeriaceae4 claims · 2 papersHirschioporaceae1 claim · 1 paperHoehnelomycetaceae6 claims · 2 papersHomortomycetaceae3 claims · 1 paperHyaloscyphaceae116 claims · 63 papersHydnaceae74 claims · 46 papersHydnangiaceae659 claims · 242 papersHydnodontaceae9 claims · 9 papersHygrophoraceae12 claims · 7 papersHymenochaetaceae686 claims · 281 papersHymenogastraceae409 claims · 167 papersHyphodiscaceae4 claims · 2 papersHypocreaceae18,458 claims · 6,288 papersHyponectriaceae40 claims · 24 papersHypoxylaceae112 claims · 57 papersHysterangiaceae13 claims · 7 papersHysteriaceae2 claims · 2 papersIncrustoporiaceae1 claim · 1 paperInocybaceae66 claims · 45 papersIrpicaceae87 claims · 32 papersIschnodermataceae10 claims · 2 papersJuglanconidaceae11 claims · 5 papersKickxellaceae2 claims · 1 paperKondoaceae1 claim · 1 paperKriegeriaceae5 claims · 1 paperKuehneromycetaceae1 claim · 1 paperLachnaceae25 claims · 10 papersLachnocladiaceae5 claims · 2 papersLaetiporaceae31 claims · 17 papersLaricifomitaceae4 claims · 3 papersLasiosphaeriaceae13 claims · 10 papersLatoruaceae4 claims · 2 papersLecanoraceae17 claims · 8 papersLentitheciaceae15 claims · 4 papersLeotiaceae4 claims · 4 papersLeptodontidiaceae17 claims · 11 papersLeptosilliaceae5 claims · 3 papersLeptosphaeriaceae2,532 claims · 708 papersLeucogastraceae2 claims · 1 paperLeucosporidiaceae1 claim · 1 paperLichtheimiaceae23 claims · 15 papersLipomycetaceae2 claims · 2 papersLobariaceae29 claims · 11 papersLongiostiolaceae2 claims · 1 paperLophiostomataceae8 claims · 8 papersLulworthiaceae6 claims · 2 papersLycoperdaceae10 claims · 5 papersLyophyllaceae25 claims · 10 papersMagnaporthaceae1,537 claims · 540 papersMalasseziaceae16 claims · 11 papersMarasmiaceae695 claims · 240 papersMarthamycetaceae36 claims · 16 papersMassariaceae3 claims · 1 paperMassarinaceae533 claims · 218 papersMedeolariaceae1 claim · 1 paperMelampsoraceae831 claims · 277 papersMelanconidaceae4 claims · 4 papersMelanconiellaceae96 claims · 41 papersMelanogastraceae37 claims · 18 papersMelanommataceae79 claims · 24 papersMelanopsaceae1 claim · 1 paperMeliolaceae25 claims · 16 papersMeripilaceae225 claims · 77 papersMeruliaceae30 claims · 14 papersMesophelliaceae11 claims · 7 papersMetacapnodiaceae1 claim · 1 paperMetschnikowiaceae201 claims · 91 papersMicroascaceae49 claims · 39 papersMicrobotryaceae285 claims · 89 papersMicrodochiaceae661 claims · 265 papersMicropeltidaceae1 claim · 1 paperMicrosporomycetaceae1 claim · 1 paperMicrostromataceae3 claims · 2 papersMicrothyriaceae5 claims · 1 paperMilesinaceae24 claims · 11 papersMniaeciaceae9 claims · 2 papersMollisiaceae198 claims · 83 papersMoniliellaceae1 claim · 1 paperMorchellaceae36 claims · 7 papersMorosphaeriaceae1 claim · 1 paperMortierellaceae224 claims · 149 papersMrakiaceae85 claims · 34 papersMucoraceae551 claims · 288 papersMuyocopronaceae60 claims · 20 papersMycenaceae139 claims · 55 papersMycosphaerellaceae11,350 claims · 3,783 papersMycotyphaceae1 claim · 1 paperMyriangiaceae2 claims · 2 papersMyrmecridiaceae6 claims · 4 papersMyxotrichaceae133 claims · 66 papersNaemateliaceae2 claims · 2 papersNaviculisporaceae7 claims · 1 paperNectriaceae60,870 claims · 20,209 papersNeocallimastigaceae15 claims · 6 papersNeocamarosporiaceae103 claims · 44 papersNeodevriesiaceae3 claims · 3 papersNeohendersoniaceae1 claim · 1 paperNeolectaceae1 claim · 1 paperNeomassariaceae3 claims · 1 paperNeozygitaceae45 claims · 16 papersNephromataceae3 claims · 3 papersNiaceae1 claim · 1 paperNidulariaceae11 claims · 5 papersNiessliaceae8 claims · 6 papersNigrogranaceae4 claims · 2 papersNosematidae38 claims · 17 papersNyssopsoraceae4 claims · 3 papersOccultibambusaceae4 claims · 3 papersOdontotremataceae3 claims · 1 paperOliveoniaceae3 claims · 2 papersOlpidiaceae269 claims · 130 papersOmphalotaceae83 claims · 35 papersOncopodiellaceae2 claims · 1 paperOnygenaceae13 claims · 9 papersOphiocordycipitaceae1,164 claims · 402 papersOphioparmaceae2 claims · 2 papersOphiostomataceae385 claims · 149 papersOrbiliaceae141 claims · 64 papersPachnocybaceae4 claims · 2 papersPachysolenaceae2 claims · 1 paperPacisporaceae7 claims · 5 papersPanaceae1 claim · 1 paperPannariaceae10 claims · 2 papersParadictyoarthriniaceae1 claim · 1 paperParaglomeraceae158 claims · 80 papersParapyrenochaetaceae1 claim · 1 paperParmeliaceae84 claims · 38 papersParmulariaceae3 claims · 1 paperPaxillaceae440 claims · 157 papersPeltigeraceae4 claims · 1 paperPenicillaginaceae10 claims · 2 papersPeniophoraceae33 claims · 23 papersPericoniaceae85 claims · 35 papersPertusariaceae1 claim · 1 paperPervetustaceae1 claim · 1 paperPezizaceae120 claims · 45 papersPezizellaceae3 claims · 3 papersPhacidiaceae168 claims · 59 papersPhaeochoraceae6 claims · 4 papersPhaeococcomycetaceae3 claims · 3 papersPhaeocollybiaceae1 claim · 1 paperPhaeolaceae12 claims · 11 papersPhaeomoniellaceae324 claims · 163 papersPhaeoseptaceae2 claims · 2 papersPhaeosphaeriaceae1,942 claims · 667 papersPhaeotremellaceae3 claims · 3 papersPhaffomycetaceae3 claims · 2 papersPhakopsoraceae1,255 claims · 361 papersPhallaceae3 claims · 1 paperPhanerochaetaceae292 claims · 124 papersPhleogenaceae5 claims · 1 paperPhlogicylindriaceae53 claims · 19 papersPhomatosporaceae1 claim · 1 paperPhragmidiaceae147 claims · 58 papersPhyllachoraceae356 claims · 103 papersPhyllostictaceae826 claims · 290 papersPhysalacriaceae1,632 claims · 501 papersPhysciaceae8 claims · 7 papersPhysodermataceae117 claims · 29 papersPichiaceae280 claims · 142 papersPileolariaceae69 claims · 28 papersPilocarpaceae1 claim · 1 paperPiskurozymaceae16 claims · 9 papersPisolithaceae1,008 claims · 346 papersPlatygloeaceae12 claims · 5 papersPlectosphaerellaceae8,395 claims · 2,661 papersPleomassariaceae1 claim · 1 paperPleosporaceae29,987 claims · 9,871 papersPleurostomataceae32 claims · 17 papersPleurotaceae207 claims · 71 papersPleurotremataceae1 claim · 1 paperPloettnerulaceae1,600 claims · 554 papersPluteaceae14 claims · 3 papersPodoscyphaceae5 claims · 3 papersPodosporaceae7 claims · 7 papersPolonosporaceae1 claim · 1 paperPolycephalomycetaceae1 claim · 1 paperPolyporaceae1,862 claims · 653 papersPorinaceae2 claims · 2 papersPorotheleaceae6 claims · 3 papersPostiaceae10 claims · 4 papersProtomycetaceae69 claims · 19 papersPsathyrellaceae86 claims · 41 papersPseudeurotiaceae17 claims · 12 papersPseudomassariaceae2 claims · 2 papersPseudoperisporiaceae11 claims · 5 papersPseudoplagiostomataceae9 claims · 7 papersPseudopyrenochaetaceae93 claims · 39 papersPterulaceae1 claim · 1 paperPucciniaceae13,404 claims · 4,165 papersPucciniastraceae298 claims · 84 papersPulvinulaceae3 claims · 2 papersPygmaeomycetaceae2 claims · 1 paperPyrenochaetopsidaceae1 claim · 1 paperPyriculariaceae8,485 claims · 2,645 papersPyronemataceae133 claims · 81 papersQuambalariaceae109 claims · 35 papersRadulomycetaceae3 claims · 3 papersRamalinaceae14 claims · 8 papersRamboldiaceae1 claim · 1 paperRamicandelaberaceae1 claim · 1 paperRaveneliaceae180 claims · 45 papersReaderielliopsidaceae1 claim · 1 paperResupinataceae1 claim · 1 paperRhamphosporaceae1 claim · 1 paperRhizinaceae89 claims · 31 papersRhizophlyctidaceae1 claim · 1 paperRhizophydiaceae1 claim · 1 paperRhizopodaceae1,612 claims · 860 papersRhizopogonaceae385 claims · 152 papersRhynchogastremaceae185 claims · 68 papersRhytismataceae344 claims · 137 papersRobbaueraceae6 claims · 2 papersRoccellaceae2 claims · 2 papersRussulaceae403 claims · 211 papersRutstroemiaceae496 claims · 152 papersSaccharataceae3 claims · 2 papersSaccharomycetaceae584 claims · 324 papersSaccharomycodaceae192 claims · 87 papersSaccharomycopsidaceae28 claims · 9 papersSaccotheciaceae592 claims · 303 papersSakaguchiaceae1 claim · 1 paperSarcoscyphaceae3 claims · 3 papersSarocladiaceae428 claims · 154 papersSchizoparmaceae234 claims · 75 papersSchizophyllaceae112 claims · 53 papersSchizoporaceae18 claims · 14 papersSchizosaccharomycetaceae9 claims · 8 papersSchizotheciaceae5 claims · 5 papersSchizothyriaceae32 claims · 15 papersSclerodermataceae176 claims · 88 papersSclerotiniaceae26,819 claims · 8,708 papersSebacinaceae51 claims · 43 papersSeptobasidiaceae13 claims · 10 papersSeptorioideaceae3 claims · 3 papersSerendipitaceae2,034 claims · 454 papersSerpulaceae14 claims · 6 papersShiraiaceae2 claims · 2 papersSordariaceae91 claims · 53 papersSparassidaceae7 claims · 4 papersSphaerobolaceae8 claims · 2 papersSphaerophoraceae2 claims · 2 papersSphaerophragmiaceae232 claims · 63 papersSpiculogloeaceae3 claims · 2 papersSpizellomycetaceae1 claim · 1 paperSporidiobolaceae355 claims · 172 papersSporocadaceae2,077 claims · 709 papersSporormiaceae15 claims · 11 papersStachybotryaceae653 claims · 196 papersSteccherinaceae10 claims · 1 paperStephanosporaceae3 claims · 3 papersStereaceae83 claims · 44 papersStereocaulaceae1 claim · 1 paperStictidaceae16 claims · 4 papersStrangosporaceae1 claim · 1 paperStrigulaceae1 claim · 1 paperStrophariaceae58 claims · 32 papersSuillaceae733 claims · 269 papersSydowiellaceae5 claims · 5 papersSymmetrosporaceae9 claims · 6 papersSympoventuriaceae88 claims · 36 papersSyncephalastraceae12 claims · 9 papersSynchytriaceae321 claims · 90 papersSynnemasporellaceae1 claim · 1 paperTaphrinaceae259 claims · 93 papersTapinellaceae1 claim · 1 paperTarzettaceae5 claims · 4 papersTeichosporaceae1 claim · 1 paperTelimenaceae6 claims · 3 papersTeloschistaceae5 claims · 4 papersTeratosphaeriaceae165 claims · 61 papersThelebolaceae14 claims · 13 papersThelephoraceae327 claims · 201 papersThermoascaceae174 claims · 80 papersThyridariaceae3 claims · 2 papersThyridiaceae10 claims · 5 papersTilachlidiaceae1 claim · 1 paperTilletiaceae1,298 claims · 402 papersTogniniaceae375 claims · 155 papersTorulaceae17 claims · 12 papersTrapeliaceae5 claims · 1 paperTremellaceae1 claim · 1 paperTrichaptaceae8 claims · 5 papersTrichocomaceae495 claims · 231 papersTricholomataceae305 claims · 103 papersTrichomeriaceae10 claims · 8 papersTrichomonascaceae50 claims · 31 papersTrichosphaeriaceae6 claims · 6 papersTrichosporonaceae27 claims · 19 papersTrigonopsidaceae1 claim · 1 paperTrimorphomycetaceae22 claims · 17 papersTruncocolumellaceae4 claims · 2 papersTubakiaceae44 claims · 12 papersTuberaceae574 claims · 194 papersTubeufiaceae1 claim · 1 paperTulasnellaceae271 claims · 123 papersTympanidaceae8 claims · 4 papersTyphulaceae167 claims · 93 papersUmbelopsidaceae15 claims · 14 papersUrocystidaceae130 claims · 41 papersUstilaginaceae2,239 claims · 755 papersValsariaceae3 claims · 3 papersVenturiaceae2,073 claims · 631 papersVerrucariaceae1 claim · 1 paperVibrisseaceae1 claim · 1 paperVuilleminiaceae2 claims · 2 papersWallemiaceae6 claims · 6 papersWickerhamomycetaceae42 claims · 23 papersWiesneriomycetaceae1 claim · 1 paperXenasmatellaceae6 claims · 1 paperXylariaceae781 claims · 313 papersXylographaceae1 claim · 1 paperZaghouaniaceae570 claims · 177 papersZygosporiaceae4 claims · 2 papersZythiaceae4 claims · 3 papersAbove family level12,426 claims · 6,093 papers
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The F2 population inoculated with B. rouxiae fit a 3:1 resistant/susceptible segregation ratio, indicating monogenic dominant resistance.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Interactor
B. rouxiaeBerkeleyomyces rouxiaee0pathogen
Outcome
3:1 resistant/susceptible segregation ratiose0
Value
3:1e0

Verbatim

e0

“The F 2 populations inoculated with either B. basicola or B. rouxiae displayed a good fit to 3:1 resistant/susceptible segregation ratios, indicating monogenic and dominant resistance to both pathogens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1638–1839
t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–94

Title

Inheritance of resistance to Berkeleyomyces rouxiae and Berkeleyomyces basicola in the lettuce cultivar La Brillante

David Nataren Perdomo; Stéfani dos Santos Leite; Tiago Bezerra Torres; et al. Euphytica 2026. doi:10.1007/s10681-026-03695-9

Other claims from this paper (4)
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The F2 population inoculated with B. basicola fit a 3:1 resistant/susceptible segregation ratio, indicating monogenic dominant resistance.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Interactor
B. basicolaBerkeleyomyces basicolae0pathogen
Outcome
3:1 resistant/susceptible segregation ratiose0
Value
3:1e0

Verbatim

e0

“The F 2 populations inoculated with either B. basicola or B. rouxiae displayed a good fit to 3:1 resistant/susceptible segregation ratios, indicating monogenic and dominant resistance to both pathogens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1638–1839
t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–94

Title

Inheritance of resistance to Berkeleyomyces rouxiae and Berkeleyomyces basicola in the lettuce cultivar La Brillante

David Nataren Perdomo; Stéfani dos Santos Leite; Tiago Bezerra Torres; et al. Euphytica 2026. doi:10.1007/s10681-026-03695-9

Other claims from this paper (4)
Observationobservedcited backgroundmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nationwide surveys in Brazil indicated similar incidence and overlapping geographical distribution of B. basicola and B. rouxiae across major lettuce-producing areas.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Interactor
B. basicolaBerkeleyomyces basicolae0pathogen
Second interactor
B. rouxiaeBerkeleyomyces rouxiaee0pathogen
Outcome
similar levels of incidencee0
Setting
Brazile0

Verbatim

e0

“Nationwide surveys in Brazil indicated similar levels of incidence as well as an overlapping geographical distribution of B. basicola and B. rouxiae across major lettuce-producing areas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–349
t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–94

Title

Inheritance of resistance to Berkeleyomyces rouxiae and Berkeleyomyces basicola in the lettuce cultivar La Brillante

David Nataren Perdomo; Stéfani dos Santos Leite; Tiago Bezerra Torres; et al. Euphytica 2026. doi:10.1007/s10681-026-03695-9

Other claims from this paper (4)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ten Cladosporium isolates were obtained from symptomatic strawberry tissue.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Interactor
CladosporiumCladosporiume0pathogen
Outcome
isolatese0
Value
Tene0

Verbatim

e0

“Ten isolates of Cladosporium were obtained”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1209–1251
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–77

Title

First Report of Fruit Rot Caused by Cladosporium anthropophilum on Strawberry in China

Yanni Liu; Hongbo Cui; Qingyan Han; et al. Plant Disease 2026. doi:10.1094/pdis-12-25-2594-pdn

Other claims from this paper (11)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strawberry fruits artificially inoculated with a spore suspension of C. anthropophilum developed symptoms identical to natural infection, while water-inoculated control fruits stayed symptomless.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae1
Treatment
artificial inoculation of healthy strawberry fruits with a spore suspensione1
Interactor
C. anthropophilumCladosporium anthropophilume1pathogen
Outcome
symptomse0
Direction
developede0
Comparator
control fruitse0

Verbatim

e0

“After 3 days, inoculated fruits developed symptoms identical to those observed on naturally infected fruits, while control fruits remained symptomless”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3760–3910
e1

“Pathogenicity of ten isolates of C. anthropophilum obtained from strawberry was confirmed by artificial inoculation of healthy strawberry fruits with a spore suspension”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3318–3486

Title

First Report of Fruit Rot Caused by Cladosporium anthropophilum on Strawberry in China

Yanni Liu; Hongbo Cui; Qingyan Han; et al. Plant Disease 2026. doi:10.1094/pdis-12-25-2594-pdn

Other claims from this paper (11)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

This is the first report of C. anthropophilum causing fruit rot of strawberry.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Interactor
C. anthropophilumCladosporium anthropophilume0pathogen
Outcome
first report of C. anthropophilum causing fruit rote0

Verbatim

e0

“this study represents the first report of C. anthropophilum causing fruit rot of strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4158–4249

Title

First Report of Fruit Rot Caused by Cladosporium anthropophilum on Strawberry in China

Yanni Liu; Hongbo Cui; Qingyan Han; et al. Plant Disease 2026. doi:10.1094/pdis-12-25-2594-pdn

Other claims from this paper (11)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All tested fungicides except Double Nickel significantly reduced white mold incidence on plants compared with nontreated plots.

Taxon
Dry Black Beant0
Treatment
All productse0
Interactor
Sclerotinia sclerotiorumSclerotinia sclerotiorume1pathogen
Outcome
incidence on plantse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
nontreated control plotse0

Verbatim

e0

“All products significantly reduced the incidence on plants compared with nontreated control plots, except for Double Nickel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–535
e1

“Sclerotinia sclerotiorum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–46
t0

“Dry Black Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–68

Title

Evaluation of Fungicides for White Mold Management in Dry Black Bean in Geneva, New York, 2024

Sarah J. Pethybridge; Aastha Subedi; Sean Murphy Plant Health Progress 2026. doi:10.1094/php-02-26-0053-pdmr

Other claims from this paper (5)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Double Nickel did not significantly reduce white mold incidence on plants compared with nontreated plots.

Taxon
Dry Black Beant0
Treatment
Double Nickele0
Interactor
Sclerotinia sclerotiorumSclerotinia sclerotiorume1pathogen
Outcome
incidence on plantse0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0
Comparator
nontreated control plotse0

Verbatim

e0

“All products significantly reduced the incidence on plants compared with nontreated control plots, except for Double Nickel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–535
e1

“Sclerotinia sclerotiorum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–46
t0

“Dry Black Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–68

Title

Evaluation of Fungicides for White Mold Management in Dry Black Bean in Geneva, New York, 2024

Sarah J. Pethybridge; Aastha Subedi; Sean Murphy Plant Health Progress 2026. doi:10.1094/php-02-26-0053-pdmr

Other claims from this paper (5)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

White mold incidence on plants with Double Nickel was not significantly different from Howler EVO, Theia and Badge X2.

Taxon
Dry Black Beant0
Treatment
Double Nickele0
Interactor
Sclerotinia sclerotiorumSclerotinia sclerotiorume1pathogen
Outcome
incidence on plantse0
Direction
not significantly differente0
Comparator
Howler EVO, Theia, and Badge X2e0

Verbatim

e0

“The incidence on plants in plots receiving Double Nickel was not significantly different from Howler EVO, Theia, and Badge X2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–662
e1

“Sclerotinia sclerotiorum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–46
t0

“Dry Black Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–68

Title

Evaluation of Fungicides for White Mold Management in Dry Black Bean in Geneva, New York, 2024

Sarah J. Pethybridge; Aastha Subedi; Sean Murphy Plant Health Progress 2026. doi:10.1094/php-02-26-0053-pdmr

Other claims from this paper (5)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All treatments significantly reduced white mold incidence on pods compared with control plots.

Taxon
Dry Black Beant0
Organ / stage
podse0
Treatment
all treatmentse0
Interactor
Sclerotinia sclerotiorumSclerotinia sclerotiorume1pathogen
Outcome
incidence of white mold on podse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
control plotse0

Verbatim

e0

“The incidence of white mold on pods was significantly reduced by all treatments compared with control plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–771
e1

“Sclerotinia sclerotiorum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–46
t0

“Dry Black Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–68

Title

Evaluation of Fungicides for White Mold Management in Dry Black Bean in Geneva, New York, 2024

Sarah J. Pethybridge; Aastha Subedi; Sean Murphy Plant Health Progress 2026. doi:10.1094/php-02-26-0053-pdmr

Other claims from this paper (5)