A. abdominalis 18 claims

Interactor role: biocontrol_agent

Literal values, not normalised. 183,098 distinct spellings cover 1,706,259 claims; only letter case and spacing are merged, so “maize”, “corn” and “Zea mays L.” are three separate entries here. The By interacting organism view merges spellings of one organism through NCBI Taxonomy.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In no-choice leaf-disc tests, parasitization of N. ribisnigri reached 54%.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Interactor
N. ribisnigriNasonovia ribisnigrie0pest
Second interactor
A. abdominalisAphelinus abdominalise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
parasitizede0
Value
54%e0

Verbatim

e0

“A. abdominalis successfully parasitized 54% and 60% of the offered N. ribisnigri and M. euphorbiae, respectively, with no significant difference.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–940
t0

“lettuce aphid Nasonovia ribisnigri”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–161

Title

Role of the aphid species and their feeding locations in parasitization behavior of Aphelinus abdominalis, a parasitoid of the lettuce aphid Nasonovia ribisnigri

Govinda Shrestha; Henrik Skovgård; Gadi V. P. Reddy; et al. PLoS ONE 2017. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0184080

Other claims from this paper (9)
Observationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In no-choice leaf-disc tests, parasitization of M. euphorbiae reached 60%, with no significant species difference.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Interactor
M. euphorbiaeMacrosiphum euphorbiaee0pest
Second interactor
A. abdominalisAphelinus abdominalise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
parasitizede0
Value
60%e0

Verbatim

e0

“A. abdominalis successfully parasitized 54% and 60% of the offered N. ribisnigri and M. euphorbiae, respectively, with no significant difference.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–940
t0

“lettuce aphid Nasonovia ribisnigri”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–161

Title

Role of the aphid species and their feeding locations in parasitization behavior of Aphelinus abdominalis, a parasitoid of the lettuce aphid Nasonovia ribisnigri

Govinda Shrestha; Henrik Skovgård; Gadi V. P. Reddy; et al. PLoS ONE 2017. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0184080

Other claims from this paper (9)
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In a choice test, A. abdominalis preferred M. euphorbiae at 38% over N. ribisnigri at 30%.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Interactor
M. euphorbiaeMacrosiphum euphorbiaee0pest
Second interactor
A. abdominalisAphelinus abdominalise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
preference for M. euphorbiaee0
Direction
highere0
Value
38%e0
Qualifier
30%e0
Comparator
N. ribisnigrie0

Verbatim

e0

“A. abdominalis had a tendency for a significantly higher preference for M. euphorbiae (38%) compared to N. ribisnigri (30%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1114
t0

“lettuce aphid Nasonovia ribisnigri”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–161

Title

Role of the aphid species and their feeding locations in parasitization behavior of Aphelinus abdominalis, a parasitoid of the lettuce aphid Nasonovia ribisnigri

Govinda Shrestha; Henrik Skovgård; Gadi V. P. Reddy; et al. PLoS ONE 2017. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0184080

Other claims from this paper (9)
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. abdominalis parasitized aphids at all tested feeding sites on lettuce plants.

Taxon
lettuce plantsLactuca sativae0
Interactor
aphidsAphidomorphae0pest
Second interactor
A. abdominalisAphelinus abdominalise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
parasitize aphidse0

Verbatim

e0

“A. abdominalis was able to parasitize aphids, regardless of their feeding locations on lettuce plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1278

Title

Role of the aphid species and their feeding locations in parasitization behavior of Aphelinus abdominalis, a parasitoid of the lettuce aphid Nasonovia ribisnigri

Govinda Shrestha; Henrik Skovgård; Gadi V. P. Reddy; et al. PLoS ONE 2017. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0184080

Other claims from this paper (9)
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Parasitization was higher for separately exposed M. euphorbiae than for N. ribisnigri on heart leaves.

Taxon
lettuce plantsLactuca sativae0
Interactor
M. euphorbiaeMacrosiphum euphorbiaee0pest
Second interactor
A. abdominalisAphelinus abdominalise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
percentages of M. euphorbiaee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
N. ribisnigri exposed only on heart leafe0

Verbatim

e0

“A. abdominalis parasitized significantly higher percentages of M. euphorbiae or N. ribisnigri when aphids were exposed separately to parasitoids on whole lettuce plants as compared with N. ribisnigri exposed only on heart leaf.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1364–1591

Title

Role of the aphid species and their feeding locations in parasitization behavior of Aphelinus abdominalis, a parasitoid of the lettuce aphid Nasonovia ribisnigri

Govinda Shrestha; Henrik Skovgård; Gadi V. P. Reddy; et al. PLoS ONE 2017. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0184080

Other claims from this paper (9)
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Parasitization was higher for separately exposed N. ribisnigri than for N. ribisnigri on heart leaves.

Taxon
lettuce plantsLactuca sativae0
Interactor
N. ribisnigriNasonovia ribisnigrie0pest
Second interactor
A. abdominalisAphelinus abdominalise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
percentages of M. euphorbiae or N. ribisnigrie0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
N. ribisnigri exposed only on heart leafe0

Verbatim

e0

“A. abdominalis parasitized significantly higher percentages of M. euphorbiae or N. ribisnigri when aphids were exposed separately to parasitoids on whole lettuce plants as compared with N. ribisnigri exposed only on heart leaf.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1364–1591

Title

Role of the aphid species and their feeding locations in parasitization behavior of Aphelinus abdominalis, a parasitoid of the lettuce aphid Nasonovia ribisnigri

Govinda Shrestha; Henrik Skovgård; Gadi V. P. Reddy; et al. PLoS ONE 2017. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0184080

Other claims from this paper (9)
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The growth-chamber choice test also showed preference for M. euphorbiae.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Interactor
M. euphorbiaeMacrosiphum euphorbiaee0pest
Second interactor
A. abdominalisAphelinus abdominalise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
preference of A. abdominalis for M. euphorbiaee0
Comparator
N. ribisnigrie0

Verbatim

e0

“A significant preference of A. abdominalis for M. euphorbiae compared to N. ribisnigri was also observed in the growth chamber choice experiment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1592–1737
t0

“lettuce aphid Nasonovia ribisnigri”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–161

Title

Role of the aphid species and their feeding locations in parasitization behavior of Aphelinus abdominalis, a parasitoid of the lettuce aphid Nasonovia ribisnigri

Govinda Shrestha; Henrik Skovgård; Gadi V. P. Reddy; et al. PLoS ONE 2017. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0184080

Other claims from this paper (9)
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. abdominalis parasitized 39% of lettuce aphids within 24 hours.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Interactor
N. ribisnigriNasonovia ribisnigrie0pest
Second interactor
A. abdominalisAphelinus abdominalise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
parasitizede0
Value
39e0
Qualifier
24-h exposure periode0

Verbatim

e0

“A. abdominalis successfully parasitized 39 and 13% of the offered N. ribisnigri and M. persicae, respectively, within a 24-h exposure period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–671
t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–79

Title

Parasitization of Commercially Available Parasitoid Species Against the Lettuce Aphid, Nasonovia ribisnigri (Hemiptera: Aphididae)

G. Shrestha; H. Skovgård; A. Enkegaard Environmental Entomology 2014. doi:10.1603/en14068

Other claims from this paper (15)
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. abdominalis parasitized 13% of green peach aphids within 24 hours.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Interactor
M. persicaeMyzus persicaee0pest
Second interactor
A. abdominalisAphelinus abdominalise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
parasitizede0
Value
13%e0

Verbatim

e0

“A. abdominalis successfully parasitized 39 and 13% of the offered N. ribisnigri and M. persicae, respectively, within a 24-h exposure period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–671
t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–79

Title

Parasitization of Commercially Available Parasitoid Species Against the Lettuce Aphid, Nasonovia ribisnigri (Hemiptera: Aphididae)

G. Shrestha; H. Skovgård; A. Enkegaard Environmental Entomology 2014. doi:10.1603/en14068

Other claims from this paper (15)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Incomplete parasitization mortality with A. abdominalis was low for both aphids.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Interactor
aphidsAphidomorphae0pest
Second interactor
A. abdominalisAphelinus abdominalise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Mortality as a result of incomplete parasitizatione0
Direction
lowe0

Verbatim

e0

“Mortality as a result of incomplete parasitization when aphids were exposed to A. abdominalis was low for both aphid species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1228
t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–79

Title

Parasitization of Commercially Available Parasitoid Species Against the Lettuce Aphid, Nasonovia ribisnigri (Hemiptera: Aphididae)

G. Shrestha; H. Skovgård; A. Enkegaard Environmental Entomology 2014. doi:10.1603/en14068

Other claims from this paper (15)