Claim · model-written summary
Artemisia survival, growth, reproduction and water potential were lower near A. desertorum than A. spicatum.
Verbatim
e0“Artemisia had lower survival, growth, reproduction, and water potential when transplanted into neighborhoods of A. desertorum than in neighborhoods of A. spicatum”
Title
Eissenstat, David M. Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) 2021. doi:10.26076/9c8b-5d6b
Other claims from this paper (11)
- Observation The grasses had similar potential growth rates at warm soil temperatures.
- Intervention effect A. desertorum had 66% greater aboveground relative growth rate than A. spicatum under prolonged cold greenhouse soil temperature.
- Observation Early spring tiller growth rates did not show the greenhouse difference in the field.
- Observation A. desertorum had greater winter and early spring root growth than A. spicatum.
- Observation A. desertorum invaded disturbed soil faster than A. spicatum, especially soon after snowmelt.
- Observation A. desertorum roots proliferated sooner than A. spicatum in early spring nutrient enrichment zones.
- Observation Later in spring A. desertorum extracted more water than A. spicatum.
- Observation Later in spring A. desertorum acquired more radiophosphorus than A. spicatum.
- Association Resource extraction differences occurred weeks before A. spicatum reached maximum root length.
- Mechanism Early root growth probably gives A. desertorum a seasonal head start in soil exploration.
- Mechanism Resource extraction differences appear only when plant demand exceeds soil supply to roots.