Claim · model-written summary
Under light, difenzoquat caused more leakage from wild oat than from wheat.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume2 - Treatment
- Difenzoquat at 1 mM under lighte2
- Interactor
- A fatua
Avena fatuae2weed - Outcome
- electrolyte leakagee2
- Direction
- moree2
- Comparator
- tolerant 'Ernest' and susceptible 'Verde' wheate2
Verbatim
e2“Difenzoquat at 1 mM under light induced more electrolyte leakage from resistant and susceptible A fatua than from tolerant 'Ernest' and susceptible 'Verde' wheat”
Title
Contact activity of difenzoquat differs from that of paraquat
Zhaohu Li; Vijay K Nandula; Calvin G Messersmith Pest Management Science 2003. doi:10.1002/ps.715
Other claims from this paper (11)
- Observation Difenzoquat induced significant electrolyte leakage from resistant wild oat leaf tissue in light and dark.
- Observation Difenzoquat induced significant electrolyte leakage from susceptible wild oat leaf tissue in light and dark.
- Observation Paraquat induced wild oat electrolyte leakage in light but not dark.
- Observation Under light, paraquat caused more electrolyte leakage than difenzoquat.
- Observation Paraquat leakage effects did not differ significantly among wild oat accessions and wheat cultivars.
- Observation Difenzoquat did not decrease chlorophyll in wild oat accessions under light.
- Observation Difenzoquat did not decrease chlorophyll in wheat cultivars under light.
- Observation Paraquat decreased chlorophyll in all four plant types.
- Observation DNA synthesis inhibition did not significantly differ between susceptible and resistant wild oat.
- Observation DNA synthesis inhibition was significantly greater in susceptible 'Verde' than tolerant 'Ernest' wheat.
- Mechanism The authors inferred different contact modes of action for difenzoquat and paraquat.
.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Hordeum vulgare