A laevis 2 claims

Interactor role: symbiont

Literal values, not normalised. 183,098 distinct spellings cover 1,706,259 claims; only letter case and spacing are merged, so “maize”, “corn” and “Zea mays L.” are three separate entries here. The By interacting organism view merges spellings of one organism through NCBI Taxonomy.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Acaulospora laevis significantly increased shoot length in nonSARD soil.

Treatment
A laevise0
Interactor
A laevisAcaulospora laevise0symbiont
Outcome
shoot lengthe0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
nonSARD soile0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Both A laevis and S calospora significantly increased shoot length and gave a higher percentage of AMFcolonised roots in nonSARD soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–844
t0

“apple rootstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–45

Title

Arbuscular mycorrhiza improve apple rootstock growth in soil conducive to specific apple replant disease

H.J. Ridgway; J. Kandula; A. Stewart Proceedings of the New Zealand Weed Control Conference 2008. doi:10.30843/nzpp.2008.61.6817

Other claims from this paper (8)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acaulospora laevis increased AMF-colonized roots in nonSARD soil.

Treatment
A laevise0
Interactor
A laevisAcaulospora laevise0symbiont
Outcome
percentage of AMFcolonised rootse0
Direction
highere0
Setting
nonSARD soile0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Both A laevis and S calospora significantly increased shoot length and gave a higher percentage of AMFcolonised roots in nonSARD soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–844
t0

“apple rootstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–45

Title

Arbuscular mycorrhiza improve apple rootstock growth in soil conducive to specific apple replant disease

H.J. Ridgway; J. Kandula; A. Stewart Proceedings of the New Zealand Weed Control Conference 2008. doi:10.30843/nzpp.2008.61.6817

Other claims from this paper (8)