Literal values, not normalised. 183,098 distinct spellings cover 1,706,259 claims; only letter case and spacing are merged, so “maize”, “corn” and “Zea mays L.” are three separate entries here. The By interacting organism view merges spellings of one organism through NCBI Taxonomy.
Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Bactrocera dorsalis infested 52 of 112 fruit species collected in the field.
Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e2 “Our results confirmed the generalist character of B . dorsalis , with the infestation of 52 out of 112 of the fruit species collected in the field ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 795–940 Other claims from this paper (6) Mechanism author interpretation original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The results provide evidence of competitive displacement of other established species induced by B. dorsalis .
Outcomecompetitive displacement e6 Verbatim
e2 “Our results confirmed the generalist character of B . dorsalis , with the infestation of 52 out of 112 of the fruit species collected in the field ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 795–940 e6 “We provide evidence of the competitive displacement induced by B . dorsalis on other established species ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1410–1514 Other claims from this paper (6) Mechanism author interpretation original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Coexistence of B. dorsalis and generalist Ceratitis species seems possible because they respond differently to climatic conditions or can exploit other host fruit species.
Second interactorgeneralist Ceratitis species e7 pest Outcomecoexistence between B . dorsalis and generalist Ceratitis species e7 Qualifierdifferent responses to climatic conditions or the capacity to exploit other host fruit species e7 Verbatim
e2 “Our results confirmed the generalist character of B . dorsalis , with the infestation of 52 out of 112 of the fruit species collected in the field ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 795–940 e7 “The coexistence between B . dorsalis and generalist Ceratitis species seems possible because they have different responses to climatic conditions or the capacity to exploit other host fruit species ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1516–1713 Other claims from this paper (6) Mechanism author interpretation original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Coexistence of B. zonata with B. dorsalis seems compromised because both species have similar ecological requirements.
Outcomecoexistence of B . zonata with B . dorsalis e5 Qualifiersimilar ecological requirements e5 Verbatim
e2 “Our results confirmed the generalist character of B . dorsalis , with the infestation of 52 out of 112 of the fruit species collected in the field ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 795–940 e5 “In contrast, the coexistence of B . zonata with B . dorsalis seems to be compromised because both species have similar ecological requirements ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1715–1857 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Parasitoid behaviors differed among fruits infested with B. dorsalis eggs.
Second interactorB . dorsalis e0 pest OutcomeBehavioral activities of F . arisanus e0 Verbatim
e0 “Behavioral activities of F . arisanus differed between all the fruits when infested with B . dorsalis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1242 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
F. arisanus preferred B. dorsalis over the two Ceratitis species, with twice the parasitism rate.
InteractorB . dorsalis e0 pest Second interactorF opius arisanus e0 biocontrol_agent Verbatim
e0 “F opius arisanus preferred B . dorsalis over C . capitata and C . cosyra , with a parasitism rate 2× higher on B . dorsalis compared to the C eratitis species ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1341–1499 t0 “vegetable fruit suitability ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–44 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
F. arisanus emergence was higher with B. dorsalis than with Ceratitis species.
Second interactorB . dorsalis e0 pest Outcomeemergence of F . arisanus e0 ComparatorC eratitis spp. e0 Verbatim
e0 “The emergence of F . arisanus was higher with B . dorsalis than with C eratitis spp. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1565–1649 t0 “vegetable fruit suitability ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–44 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
B. dorsalis completed development earlier than Ceratitis species.
InteractorB . dorsalis e0 pest OutcomeB . dorsalis completed its development e0 ComparatorC eratitis spp. e0 Verbatim
e0 “B . dorsalis completed its development earlier than C eratitis spp. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1659–1726 t0 “vegetable fruit suitability ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–44 Other claims from this paper (7)