I. textori 2 claims

Interactor role: other

Literal values, not normalised. 183,098 distinct spellings cover 1,706,259 claims; only letter case and spacing are merged, so “maize”, “corn” and “Zea mays L.” are three separate entries here. The By interacting organism view merges spellings of one organism through NCBI Taxonomy.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two Impatiens species share flowering season, pollinator fauna and pollen placement.

Taxon
I. noli-tangereImpatiens noli-tangeree0
Interactor
I. textoriImpatiens textoriie0other
Outcome
same pollination nichee0

Verbatim

e0

“We demonstrate that I. noli-tangere and I. textori share the same pollination niche (i.e., flowering season, pollinator fauna, and position of pollen on the pollinator's body).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–739

Title

Demonstration of pollinator‐mediated competition between two native Impatiens species, Impatiens noli‐tangere and I. textori (Balsaminaceae)

Nanako Tokuda; Mitsuru Hattori; Kota Abe; et al. Ecology and Evolution 2015. doi:10.1002/ece3.1431

Other claims from this paper (4)
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heterospecific pollen was deposited on most stigmas and fruit set was depressed in I. noli-tangere flowers within 2 m of the other species.

Taxon
I. noli-tangereImpatiens noli-tangeree0
Interactor
I. textoriImpatiens textoriie0other
Outcome
depressed fruit sete0
Direction
depressede0
Qualifier
within 2 me0

Verbatim

e0

“heterospecific pollen grains were deposited on most stigmas of both I. noli-tangere and I. textori flowers that were situated within 2 m of flowers of the other species resulting in depressed fruit set.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–955

Title

Demonstration of pollinator‐mediated competition between two native Impatiens species, Impatiens noli‐tangere and I. textori (Balsaminaceae)

Nanako Tokuda; Mitsuru Hattori; Kota Abe; et al. Ecology and Evolution 2015. doi:10.1002/ece3.1431

Other claims from this paper (4)