IB-Group 4 claims

Interactor role: pathogen

Literal values, not normalised. 183,098 distinct spellings cover 1,706,259 claims; only letter case and spacing are merged, so “maize”, “corn” and “Zea mays L.” are three separate entries here. The By interacting organism view merges spellings of one organism through NCBI Taxonomy.

Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rb6 plays an important part in the resistance of Zenith to IB-Group isolates

Taxon
rice plantOryza sativat0
Material
Zenithe4
Treatment
sheath inoculatione4
Interactor
IB-Groupe4pathogen
Gene
Rb6e4
Outcome
resistancee4

Verbatim

t0

“resistance of rice plant to blast fungus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–59
e4

“The data of the sheath inoculation suggested that Rb6 plays an important part, and Pi-z a minor part, respectively, in the resistance of Zenith to isolates of IB-Group”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–960

Title

Genetic studies on resistance of rice plant to blast fungus. II. Difference in resistance to the blast disease between fukunishiki and its parental cultivar, Zenith.

Iwasaburo GOTO Japanese Journal of Phytopathology 1976. doi:10.3186/jjphytopath.42.253

Other claims from this paper (14)
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pi-z plays a minor part in the resistance of Zenith to IB-Group isolates

Taxon
rice plantOryza sativat0
Material
Zenithe4
Treatment
sheath inoculatione4
Interactor
IB-Groupe4pathogen
Gene
Pi-ze4
Outcome
resistancee4
Qualifier
a minor parte4

Verbatim

t0

“resistance of rice plant to blast fungus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–59
e4

“The data of the sheath inoculation suggested that Rb6 plays an important part, and Pi-z a minor part, respectively, in the resistance of Zenith to isolates of IB-Group”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–960

Title

Genetic studies on resistance of rice plant to blast fungus. II. Difference in resistance to the blast disease between fukunishiki and its parental cultivar, Zenith.

Iwasaburo GOTO Japanese Journal of Phytopathology 1976. doi:10.3186/jjphytopath.42.253

Other claims from this paper (14)
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fukunishiki is significantly more susceptible to IB-Group than Zenith

Taxon
rice plantOryza sativat0
Material
Fukunishikie7
Interactor
IB-Groupe7pathogen
Outcome
susceptible to IB-Groupe7
Direction
more susceptiblee7
Comparator
Zenithe7

Verbatim

t0

“resistance of rice plant to blast fungus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–59
e7

“Fukunishiki was significantly more susceptible to IB-Group than Zenith, but seemed to be slightly more resistant than the testers with Pi-z+”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1102

Title

Genetic studies on resistance of rice plant to blast fungus. II. Difference in resistance to the blast disease between fukunishiki and its parental cultivar, Zenith.

Iwasaburo GOTO Japanese Journal of Phytopathology 1976. doi:10.3186/jjphytopath.42.253

Other claims from this paper (14)
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fukunishiki is slightly more resistant than the testers with Pi-z+

Taxon
rice plantOryza sativat0
Material
Fukunishikie7
Interactor
IB-Groupe7pathogen
Outcome
resistante7
Direction
slightly more resistante7
Comparator
the testers with Pi-z+e7

Verbatim

t0

“resistance of rice plant to blast fungus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–59
e7

“Fukunishiki was significantly more susceptible to IB-Group than Zenith, but seemed to be slightly more resistant than the testers with Pi-z+”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1102

Title

Genetic studies on resistance of rice plant to blast fungus. II. Difference in resistance to the blast disease between fukunishiki and its parental cultivar, Zenith.

Iwasaburo GOTO Japanese Journal of Phytopathology 1976. doi:10.3186/jjphytopath.42.253

Other claims from this paper (14)