M. campanulae 3 claims

Interactor role: pollinator

Literal values, not normalised. 183,098 distinct spellings cover 1,706,259 claims; only letter case and spacing are merged, so “maize”, “corn” and “Zea mays L.” are three separate entries here. The By interacting organism view merges spellings of one organism through NCBI Taxonomy.

3 claims

Open in search (filters, sorting) →

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

To conserve M. campanulae, Campanula flowers must also be conserved.

Taxon: CampanulaCampanulae3
Interactor: M. campanulaeMegachile campanulaee3pollinator
Outcome: conserve Campanula flowerse3

Verbatim

e3
“This outcome suggests that to conserve M. campanulae, people must also conserve Campanula flowers”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1126

Title

Nest Pollen Provisions from an Urban Population of Megachile campanulae (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) in Minnesota are Consistent with Oligolectic Classification.

Lam D Le; Thea A Evans; Colleen Satyshur The Great Lakes Entomologist 2025. doi:10.22543/0090-0222.2510

Other claims from this paper (3)

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M. campanulae overvisited male-phase flowers.

Taxon: Campanula americanaCampanula americanae1
Organ / stage: male-phase flowerse0
Interactor: M. campanulaeMegachile campanulaee0pollinator
Outcome: overvisited male-phase flowerse0
Direction: overvisitede0

Verbatim

e0
“Small bees and M. campanulae overvisited male-phase flowers”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–862

e1
“In the widespread protandrous herb, Campanula americana, visitation by three pollinators”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 337–425

Title

Supplementary material from "Linking pollinator efficiency to patterns of pollen limitation: small bees exploit the plant–pollinator mutualism"

Koski, Matthew H.; Ison, Jennifer L.; Padilla, Ashley; et al. Figshare 2018. doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4106120.v1

Other claims from this paper (10)

Association Visitation by three pollinators explained 63% of variation in pollen limitation among populations.
Observation Bumblebees enhanced reproductive success.
Observation Megachile campanulae enhanced reproductive success.
Observation Small solitary bees exacerbated pollen limitation.
Observation Small bees overvisited male-phase flowers.
Observation Bumblebees frequently visited female-phase flowers.
Observation Fewer bumblebee visits saturated seed set than visits by other bees.
Mechanism Small bees depleted large amounts of pollen through male-biased visits and infrequent deposition.
Mechanism Small bees reduce plant reproduction by limiting pollen available to efficient pollinators.
Observation Small bees are unlikely to compensate for reproductive failure when bumblebees are scarce.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Megachile campanulae overvisited male-phase flowers.

Taxon: Campanula americanaCampanula americanae1
Organ / stage: male-phase flowerse0
Interactor: M. campanulaeMegachile campanulaee0pollinator
Outcome: overvisited male-phase flowerse0

Verbatim

e0
“Small bees and M. campanulae overvisited male-phase flowers”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–862

e1
“Campanula americana”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–391

Title

Linking pollinator efficiency to patterns of pollen limitation: small bees exploit the plant–pollinator mutualism

Matthew H. Koski; Jennifer L. Ison; Ashley Padilla; et al. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences 2018. doi:10.1098/rspb.2018.0635

Other claims from this paper (10)