Claim · model-written summary
Abamectin was more toxic to phytophagous mites than to the main predator.
- Taxon
- apple
Malus domesticae1 - Treatment
- Abamectine0
- Interactor
- phytophagous mitese0pest
- Second interactor
- T pyriTyphlodromus pyrie0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- favourable selectivitye0
- Direction
- more toxice0
- Comparator
- T pyrie0
Verbatim
e0“Abamectin and clofentezine had favourable selectivity (more toxic to the two phytophagous mites than to T pyri).”
e1“apple orchards”
Title
John M Hardman; Jeffrey L Franklin; Debra L Moreau; et al. Pest Management Science 2003. doi:10.1002/ps.769
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Observation Panonychus ulmi was the dominant and more harmful phytophagous mite.
- Intervention effect Clofentezine was more toxic to phytophagous mites than to the main predator.
- Intervention effect Pyridaben at 450 g ha(-1) was equally toxic to pests and predators.
- Intervention effect Spirodiclofen at 180 and 240 g ha(-1) was equally toxic to pests and predators.
- Intervention effect Pyridaben at 216 g ha(-1) was more toxic to the predator T pyri.
- Intervention effect Dicofol was more toxic to the predator T pyri.
- Intervention effect Formetanate hydrochloride was more toxic to the predator T pyri.
- Intervention effect Propargite was more toxic to the predator T pyri.
- Intervention effect Pyridaben at 2160 g ha(-1) increased P ulmi-days over the untreated control.
- Observation Resistance of P ulmi to dicofol and propargite probably complicated some trials.