Literal values, not normalised. 183,098 distinct spellings cover 1,706,259 claims; only letter case and spacing are merged, so “maize”, “corn” and “Zea mays L.” are three separate entries here. The By interacting organism view merges spellings of one organism through NCBI Taxonomy.
Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Eighteen pumpkin scent compounds were electroantennographically active for rootworm.
OutcomeEAD-active compounds for WCR e0 Verbatim
e0 “We identified 18 non-sex specific EAD-active compounds for WCR. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–783 t0 “Oil Pumpkin ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–142 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The main pumpkin scent compound 1,4-dimethoxybenzene was not attractive to rootworm in field tests.
Treatment1,4-dimethoxybenzene e0 Outcomeattractive to WCR e0 Directionnot attractive e0 Comparatorcomplete pumpkin mixture e0 Verbatim
e0 “In field tests, 1,4-dimethoxybenzene, the main compound in pumpkin floral scent, was not attractive to WCR, whereas (E)-p-methoxycinnamaldehyde, a minor compound, was as attractive as the complete pumpkin mixture. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–997 t0 “Oil Pumpkin ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–142 Other claims from this paper (2) Mechanism author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Maize and WCR phenological interactions plus gender-specific behaviors appeared to be key determinants of WCR activity in first-year maize.
OutcomeWCR activity in first-year maize e4 Qualifierphenological interactions plus gender-specific behaviors e4 Settingnortheast Nebraska, USA e0 Verbatim
e0 “during 2021-2022 in northeast Nebraska, USA ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–455 e4 “Maize and WCR phenological interactions plus gender-specific behaviors appeared to be key determinants of WCR activity in first-year maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–916 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
WCR collections from first-year and adjacent continuous maize fields showed similar Bt resistance levels.
Outcomeresistance levels e5 Comparatoradjacent continuous maize fields e5 Settingnortheast Nebraska, USA e0 Verbatim
e0 “during 2021-2022 in northeast Nebraska, USA ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–455 e5 “Similar resistance levels were observed in WCR collections from first-year and many adjacent continuous maize fields ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1346 Other claims from this paper (5) Association author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Adjacent maize fields were a major contributor of WCR immigrants.
Treatmentadjacent maize fields e6 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e6 “Aggregate study results suggest adjacent maize fields were a major contributor of WCR immigrants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1348–1444 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Significant variation in WCR immigration, colonization and associated Bt resistance levels was observed in first-year maize.
OutcomeWCR immigration/ colonization and associated Bt resistance levels e7 Verbatim
e7 “Significant variation in WCR immigration/ colonization and associated Bt resistance levels were observed in first-year maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1446–1570 Other claims from this paper (5) Recommendation author interpretation original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Scouting of first-year maize fields is recommended to match WCR management approaches to the relative risk of injury in second-year maize.
TreatmentWCR management approaches e7 Outcomescouting of first-year maize fields e7 Verbatim
e7 “scouting of first-year maize fields is recommended to match appropriate WCR management approaches to relative risk of injury in second-year maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1575–1720 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
T. virens colonization of maize roots suppressed western corn rootworm larval survival and weight gain.
TreatmentT. virens colonization of maize rootse7 OutcomeWCR larvae survival and weight gain e7 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Regulate Maize Resistance to Anthracnose Leaf Blight ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–115 e7 “T. virens colonization of maize roots suppressed WCR larvae survival and weight gain ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1494–1578 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Under well-watered conditions the spectral profiles of maize separated between Western corn rootworm treatments.
Outcomespectral profiles separated e0 Settingwell-watered conditions e0 Verbatim
e0 “Under well-watered conditions, the spectral profiles separated between WCR treatments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–895 t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Foliar spectral profiles of maize separated under drought conditions irrespective of Western corn rootworm presence.
Outcomefoliar spectral profiles separated e0 Settingdrought conditions e0 Verbatim
e0 “The foliar spectral profiles separated under drought conditions, irrespective of WCR presence ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1050 t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 Other claims from this paper (6)