Claim · model-written summary
Bacterial suspensions inhibited sclerotia germination in soil by 85% to 95% for the three most effective isolates.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise1 - Treatment
- bacterial suspensionse0
- Outcome
- inhibition of sclerotia germination in soile0
- Value
- 85% to 95%e0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The inhibition of sclerotia germination in soil by the bacterial suspensions varied from 85% to 95% for the aforementioned 3 isolates”
e1“the fungus is responsible of important damages on sugar beet crop”
Title
Michelle G. S. Bidima; Noureddine Chtaina; Brahim Ezzahiri; et al. International journal of food science and agriculture 2021. doi:10.26855/ijfsa.2021.12.007
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Observation 14 bacterial isolates showed antifungal activity against Sclerotium rolfsii.
- Observation Isolate O4 was among the most efficient in vitro, inhibiting Sclerotium rolfsii mycelial growth by 98.16%.
- Observation Isolate E10 was among the most efficient in vitro, inhibiting Sclerotium rolfsii mycelial growth by 96.22%.
- Observation Isolate E7 was among the most efficient in vitro, inhibiting Sclerotium rolfsii mycelial growth by 87.81%.
- Observation Culture filtrates of isolate O4 inhibited mycelial growth by 30. 62% to 98.93%, depending on filtrate proportion.
- Observation Culture filtrates of isolate O4 inhibited sclerotia germination by 44.69% to 98.75%, depending on filtrate proportion.
- Mechanism The bacteria appear to produce secondary metabolites that inhibit Sclerotium rolfsii mycelial growth.
- Observation Disease incidence in chickpea was 7.5% with T-O4 bacterized seeds.
- Intervention effect Disease severity 30 days after inoculation was 20% for the T-O4 treatment, against 89% for the T control in chickpea.
- Observation In vivo tests on chickpea showed a very highly significant difference between the isolates.