Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Charcoal and sawdust at 10 tonnes per hectare each produced the highest cassava belowground biomass, 5.44 tonnes per hectare.

A claim from Soil Amendments to Re-establish Agricultural Production on Ex-tin Mined Area · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Charcoal and sawdust at 10 tonnes per hectare each produced the highest cassava belowground biomass, 5.44 tonnes per hectare.

Treatment
charcoal and sawdust was applied at 10 t.ha-1 eache0
Outcome
cassava belowground biomasse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
5.44 ton.ha-1e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“charcoal and sawdust was applied at 10 t.ha-1 each, showed the highest total cassava belowground biomass (5.44 ton.ha-1 ) as well as cassava aboveground biomass (3.06 ton.ha-1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2684–2894

Title

Soil Amendments to Re-establish Agricultural Production on Ex-tin Mined Area

Rizki Maftukhah; Ngadisih Ngadisih; Murtingrum Murtiningrum; et al. 2020. doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-21166

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-0284bbdcb8927b069e5e04ce335a661f44726c18485f67114e4b77c3b2a4fb3a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

charcoal · growth · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

growing medium · growth · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.