Claim · model-written summary
The planter required 7.57 hr/ha versus 11.12 hr/ha manually.
- Taxon
- Cotton
Gossypium hirsutumt0 - Outcome
- average time requiremente0
- Value
- 7.57 hr/hae0
- Qualifier
- 11.12 hr/hae0
- Comparator
- manually sowinge0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentSettingDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“average time requirement by manually operated cotton planter was 7.57 hr/ha while manually sowing around 11.12 hr/ha”
t0“Cotton”
Title
Performance Evaluation of Manually Operated Single Row Cotton Planter
Rangapara Dineshkumar; Pandya Jaimin; M. Tech http://www.ijesrt.com/issues%20pdf%20file/Archives-2014/September-2014/7.pdf 2014
Other claims from this paper (6)
- Method / resource The planter operated at 1.62 km/h.
- Method / resource The planter had field capacity of 0.132 ha/hr and efficiency of 79.52%.
- Method / resource The planter had field efficiency of 79.52%.
- Method / resource Cotton seed damage was 1.236% greater with the planter than manual dibbling.
- Method / resource The planter seed rate averaged 3.031 kg/ha.
- Method / resource Machine planting cost 168 Rs/ha versus approximately 209 Rs/ha manually.