Claim · model-written summary
No-till wheat yield variability was similar to conventional.
- Taxon
- winter wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Outcome
- yield variabilitye1
- Direction
- similare0
- Comparator
- CT systeme1
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“similar in the NT (corn and winter wheat phases) systems”
e1“Compared to the CT system, yield variability was 40% lower in the LI (corn phase), 33% lower in the NT (soybean phase) and similar in the NT (corn and winter wheat phases) systems”
Title
Temporal Yield Variability under Conventional and Alternative Management Systems
Richard G. Smith; Fabian D. Menalled; G. P. Robertson Agronomy Journal 2007. doi:10.2134/agronj2007.0096
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Observation Conventional and no-till yields were similar across crop phases.
- Observation Conventional and no-till wheat yields exceeded low-input wheat yields.
- Observation Organic corn yields were lower than other systems.
- Observation Organic winter wheat yields were lower than other systems.
- Observation Soybean yields were similar across management systems.
- Observation Organic soybean yield variability was highest, at 48%.
- Observation Organic winter wheat yield variability was highest, at 33%.
- Observation Low-input corn yield variability was 40% lower than conventional.
- Observation No-till soybean yield variability was 33% lower than conventional.
- Observation No-till corn yield variability was similar to conventional.