Claim · model-written summary
RAPD fingerprints could not be reproduced with the recovered flower.
- Taxon
- Pelargonium peltatum
Pelargonium peltatumt0 - Outcome
- RAPD fingerprintse0
- Comparator
- recovered flower templatee0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“RAPD fingerprints were not reproducible using the recovered flower template”
t0“Pelargonium peltatum”
Title
AFLP fingerprinting in Pelargonium peltatum:Its development and potential in cultivar identification
G. Barcaccia; E. Albertini; M. Falcinelli The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 1999. doi:10.1080/14620316.1999.11511102
Other claims from this paper (7)
- Method / resource The optimized protocol yielded 162 RAPD markers.
- Method / resource The optimized protocol yielded 568 AFLP markers.
- Method / resource AFLP fingerprints averaged 47 markers.
- Method / resource AFLP evidence distinguished the recovered flower from each seized plant.
- Method / resource AFLP markers discriminated genetically different pelargoniums with similar phenotypes.
- Recommendation The authors recommend AFLP markers for granting Plant Breeders Rights.
- Recommendation The authors propose AFLP fingerprinting for future breeding and cultivar testing.