Claim · model-written summary
Euonymus bud primordia number did not correspond to next-year shoot leaf number.
EuonymusNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“number of leaves per shoot the following year did not correspond to bud morphology”
t0“EUONYMUS”
Title
Gary W. Knox Purdue e-Pubs (Purdue University System) 1984
Other claims from this paper (16)
- Intervention effect Low light produced more leaf primordia in terminal buds of Euonymus.
- Intervention effect Euonymus in full sunlight had the greatest stem and root soluble sugars and starch.
- Intervention effect Light did not influence bud morphology in privet.
- Intervention effect Light did not influence stem and root soluble sugars and starch in privet.
- Intervention effect Light did not influence bud morphology in viburnum.
- Intervention effect Light did not influence stem and root soluble sugars and starch in viburnum.
- Intervention effect Viburnum dry weights were greatest under 53%, 70% and 100% light after one season.
- Association Prior-year light strongly affected second-season plant dry weight.
- Intervention effect Viburnum grown in full sun in 1982 had the greatest dry weights in 1983.
- Intervention effect Privet shaded in 1982 had the greatest shoot dry weights in 1983 regardless of 1983 light.
- Intervention effect Full sun in 1982 increased viburnum branch number, branch length and internode length in 1983.
- Intervention effect Privet in 100% light in 1983 was more branched than shaded plants.
- Observation Willowwood viburnum tolerated 53% to 100% light.
- Observation Regel privet tolerated all tested light intensities.
- Intervention effect Light intensity did not significantly affect Euonymus growth.
- Recommendation The authors suggest varying light to improve growth and branching and shorten time to sale.