Claim · model-written summary
Varieties 28, 32 and 15 were selected as optimal candidates.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Material
- varieties 28, 32 and 15e0
- Outcome
- optimal candidatese0
Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“only varieties 28, 32 and 15 emerged as optimal candidates”
t0“wheat”
Title
Qudratullah Soofizada; Antonio Pescatore; Simone Orlandini; et al. European Journal of Agronomy 2025. doi:10.1016/j.eja.2025.127786
Other claims from this paper (13)
- Association Environment explained over 80% of grain yield variance.
- Association Environment explained over 80% of straw yield variance.
- Association Genotype by environment interactions were significant.
- Observation Variety 28 exceeded 4.0 t ha⁻¹ grain yield with high stability.
- Observation Variety 32 exceeded 4.0 t ha⁻¹ grain yield with high stability.
- Observation Nitrogen uptake efficiency ranged from 0.41 to 0.72.
- Observation Varieties 11, 19 and 20 combined high nitrogen efficiency with consistent performance.
- Association Protein content was mostly determined by environment.
- Observation Variety 15 had exceptional protein stability and quality.
- Association Nitrogen-adjusted margin was significantly associated with nitrogen uptake efficiency.
- Association Nitrogen-adjusted margin was significantly associated with straw yield.
- Method / resource Regression explained 96.5% of nitrogen-adjusted margin variability.
- Method / resource The composite index allowed multi-trait ranking.