W2 gave the maximum net returns and benefit cost ratio.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Taxon: aromatic ricet0
Treatment: W2e0
Outcome: net returns and B: C ratioe0
Direction: maximume0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0
“the maximum value of net returns and B: C ratio was recorded under W2”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1019

t0
“aromatic rice”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 76–89

Title

Effect of Nutrient and Weed Management Practices on Yields and Economics of Aromatic Rice in Semi Arid Region of Bihar, India

Shashimala Kumari; Vinay Kumar; Shashidhar Yadav; et al. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2020. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2020.903.011

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect N1 gave the maximum grain and straw yield.
Intervention effect N1 gave the maximum benefit cost ratio.
Intervention effect W5 gave the maximum rice grain and straw yield.
Intervention effect W5 gave the maximum gross return.
Recommendation The authors conclude that N1 is superior to N2 and N3.
Recommendation The authors consider herbicidal treatments more viable than manual weeding because of cost.
Recommendation The authors recommend W2 for transplanted aromatic rice.

Record rev-0da33101ea2667d0e4931c46193168b56a11ff0df4b40a95943f7a0c7d7defec · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer