Claim · model-written summary
Wheat and rye dry matter followed less complex patterns across harvest dates.
- Taxon
- Wheat and rye
Secale cereale
Triticum aestivume0 - Outcome
- accumulated DMe0
- Direction
- accumulatede0
- Qualifier
- less complex patternse0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Wheat and rye cultivars accumulated DM in less complex patterns over harvest dates”
Title
Fall Growth Potential of Cereal Grain Forages in Northern Arkansas
J. L. Gunsaulis; W. K. Coblentz; R. K. Ogden; et al. Agronomy Journal 2008. doi:10.2134/agronj2007.0301
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Observation Triticale and oat dry matter accumulated in a cubic pattern over time at Fayetteville in 2004.
- Observation Maximum wheat cultivar yield was 2554 kg ha −1.
- Observation Maximum oat cultivar yield was 4661 kg ha −1.
- Observation Batesville 2004 mean DM yield was 491 kg ha −1.
- Observation Fayetteville 2005 mean DM yield was 988 kg ha −1.
- Observation Fayetteville 2004 mean DM yield was 1960 kg ha −1.
- Observation Wheat, rye and triticale averaged 4148 kg ha −1 on the final Batesville 2005 harvest.
- Observation Oat cultivars were sensitive to November freezing and ranked last for yield at final harvest.
- Recommendation The authors recommend cultivars with some stem elongation for fall forage when planted in early September, noting winter-survival risk.