Claim · model-written summary
The reservoir vegetation is interpreted as a hydrach succession from first through second to third type.
- Taxon
- vegetatione0
- Outcome
- hydrarche0
- Qualifier
- succeeded from the first to the second and ended in the third typee0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValue
Verbatim
e0“The hydrarch which succeeded from the first to the second and ended in the third type will be illustrated in the vegetation among the three types of the artificial reservoirs”
Title
The Plant Ecological Studies of Lakes and Marshes having a Period of Drainage
Shoen KAMURO Shokubutsugaku Zasshi 1957. doi:10.15281/jplantres1887.70.305
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Observation Three vegetation types occur in periodically dried reservoirs.
- Observation The first type has a regular zonation with annual dominated amphiphyte communities.
- Observation The second type has an intermediate structure and mixed emergent plant communities.
- Observation The third type has marsh vegetation dominated by large emergent plants, especially Phragmites, extending centrally.
- Observation Hemicryptophytes are generally abundant in all three reservoir types.
- Observation The amphiphyte zones are therophytic, hydrophytic and helophytic in the first, second and third vegetation types, respectively.
- Observation Therophyte components increase in the first type and decrease in the second.
- Observation Helophytic components are sparse in the first type and abundant in the second and third.
- Mechanism Winter seed preservation, annual germination correlation and helophyte control may shape early communities after drainage.