Method / resourcemodel-written summary

Roll tube and MPN procedures gave similar total anaerobic bacterial counts.

A claim from Comparison of Two Methods for Enumeration of Anaerobe Numbers on Forages and Evaluation of Ethylene Oxide Treatment for Forage Sterilization · 1989

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Roll tube and MPN procedures gave similar total anaerobic bacterial counts.

Outcome
total bacteriae0
Comparator
roll tubee0

Not reportedTaxonMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentSettingDirectionValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“No difference was found between the roll tube and MPN procedures for total bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–553

Title

Comparison of Two Methods for Enumeration of Anaerobe Numbers on Forages and Evaluation of Ethylene Oxide Treatment for Forage Sterilization

W. L. Shockey; B. A. Dehority Applied and Environmental Microbiology 1989. doi:10.1128/aem.55.7.1766-1768.1989

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-0ef57ec856dfbf38cc914a6501299ef8862425d0d4f5e54b5d82d04690248eaa · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer