Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Stylar pollination was substantially more successful than placental pollination in producing mature seeds per ovary.

A claim from Effect of^|^ldquo;Stylar Pollination^|^rdquo;on in vitro Seed Setting of Petunia hybrida · 1976

Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stylar pollination was substantially more successful than placental pollination in producing mature seeds per ovary.

Taxon
Petunia hybridaPetunia ×hybridat0
Treatment
stylar pollinatione5
Outcome
number of mature seeds per ovarye5
Direction
more successfule5
Comparator
placental pollinatione5

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Petunia x hybrida
Petunia ×hybrida · TaxonW. Bulach · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Seed Setting of Petunia hybrida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–88
e5

“It was concluded that the number of mature seeds per ovary depends upon the technique of pollination, that is, stylar pollination was substantially more successful than the placental pollination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1426–1620

Title

Effect of^|^ldquo;Stylar Pollination^|^rdquo;on in vitro Seed Setting of Petunia hybrida

Yoshiji NIIMI Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science 1976. doi:10.2503/jjshs.45.168

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-0fb5af65a7bca7b6a6d631bc5404be5ff432c4eaeda7bde3755bbe7895c4ce1a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

pollination · yield · Petunia x hybrida (garden petunia)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.