Claim · model-written summary
Wheat yield decreased significantly as planting date was delayed in the drilled pattern, because of mechanical damage.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume3 - Treatment
- planting date was delayede3
- Outcome
- wheat yielde3
- Direction
- decreasede3
- Qualifier
- because of mechanical damagee3
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“wheat yield was significantly ( P < 0.05) decreased as planting date was delayed in the drilled pattern because of mechanical damage”
Title
Intercropping Soybean into Standing Green Wheat1
T. M. Reinbott; Z. R. Helsel; D. G. Helsel; et al. Agronomy Journal 1987. doi:10.2134/agronj1987.00021962007900050026x
Other claims from this paper (7)
- Intervention effect Wheat yield was reduced by 23 and 16% when soybean was intercropped in the drilled and skiprow patterns, respectively.
- Intervention effect The date of planting did not significantly influence wheat yield in the skiprow patterns.
- Intervention effect Intercropped soybean yielded 27% less than conventional soybean over all years and treatments.
- Intervention effect Intercropped soybean yielded 28% more than doublecropped soybean over all years and treatments.
- Intervention effect Drilling soybean at the heading stage of wheat gave the greatest yields.
- Intervention effect Nitrogen above 56 kg/ha caused excessive wheat growth and a reduction in drilled intercropped soybean yield through competition for light.
- Recommendation Drilling soybean in wheat at heading can give optimum intercrop performance when mechanical damage to wheat is minimized.