Intervention effectmodel-written summary

At 2 t ha–1 mustard residue, Panichaise inhibition was 80.88.

A claim from Allelopathic potential of mustard crop residues on weed management and performance of transplant Aman rice · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 2 t ha–1 mustard residue, Panichaise inhibition was 80.88.

Taxon
T. aman ricee1
Treatment
mustard crop residues @ 2 t ha–1e0
Interactor
Panichaise (Scirpus juncoides)Schoenoplectiella juncoidese0weed
Outcome
percent inhibitione0
Direction
higheste0
Value
80.88e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Schoenoplectiella juncoides
Schoenoplectiella juncoides · InteractorDavid Eickhoff from Pearl City, Hawaii, USA · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest percent inhibition of 71.17, 69.19, 80.88, 70.48 and 86.97 was in Shama (Echinochlo acrusgalli), Panishapla (Nymphaea nouchali), Panichaise (Scirpus juncoides), Panikachu (Monochoria vaginalis) and Susnishak (Marsilea quadrifolia), respectively which was caused by the application of mustard crop residues @ 2 t ha–1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1579
e1

“crop performance of T. aman rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–487

Title

Allelopathic potential of mustard crop residues on weed management and performance of transplant Aman rice

MN Hossain; MR Uddin; UK Sarker; et al. Journal of the Bangladesh Agricultural University 2017. doi:10.3329/jbau.v15i2.35054

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-10fa053c6c71efbecedcc1cfff111a7d9c019cc77db10c072bc9e2bbd603dcf9 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

organic · Schoenoplectiella juncoides · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.