Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Prochloraz plus triticonazole gave 2.89% rot.

A claim from Effects of Genotype, Sowing Time and Seed Fungicide Pre-Treatments on Root and Crown Rot and Grain Yield in Bread Wheat · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prochloraz plus triticonazole gave 2.89% rot.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
prochloraz + triticonazolee0
Outcome
root and crown rote0
Value
2.89%e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“prothioconazole + tebuconazole, carboxin + thiram and prochloraz + triticonazole, with 1.96%, 2.10% and 2.89% root and crown rot, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1333–1475
t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–119

Title

Effects of Genotype, Sowing Time and Seed Fungicide Pre-Treatments on Root and Crown Rot and Grain Yield in Bread Wheat

İsmet BAŞER; İlker GİDER; Oğuz BİLGİN; et al. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi 2020. doi:10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.725206

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-11ae162e47517f8a7e4bcdcb98df04053f7a68346ae0cfa38984595d23cb7e0e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

prochloraz · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

triticonazole · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.