Observationmodel-written summary

The benefits of not tilling the soil were not immediate.

A claim from INVESTIGATING THE EFFECT(S) OF CONTRASTING NITROGEN (N), PHOSPHORUS (P), AND POTASSIUM (K) FERTILIZER RATES ON CASSAVA TUBER YIELD AND QUALITY AND MAIZE GRAIN YIELD IN SOUTHERN AFRICA · 2014

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The benefits of not tilling the soil were not immediate.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse3
Treatment
not tilling the soile6
Outcome
benefitse6
Qualifier
are not immediatee6

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Economically optimum maize grain yields (EOY) and profits (EOP) for the southwest lowlands of Maphutseng village, Mohale’s Hoek District, Lesotho, were estimated at 222 kg, 182 kg, and 123 kg of N (applied as limestone ammonium nitrate) per ha for no-till vertisol, no-till inceptisol, and till vertisol maize systems, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1378
e6

“The results also confirmed that the benefits of not tilling the soil are not immediate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1510–1596

Title

INVESTIGATING THE EFFECT(S) OF CONTRASTING NITROGEN (N), PHOSPHORUS (P), AND POTASSIUM (K) FERTILIZER RATES ON CASSAVA TUBER YIELD AND QUALITY AND MAIZE GRAIN YIELD IN SOUTHERN AFRICA

Ivan Cuvaca 2014

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-128c8fbd43fedb28c1a0407d582642d94be684eb205451b25b3b4f107fa89707 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer