Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The dicamba mecoprop MCPA tank mixture lowered wild oat control versus MKH 6562 alone or other broadleaf mixtures.

A claim from Control of Wild Oat (Avena fatua) in Wheat with MKH 65621 · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The dicamba mecoprop MCPA tank mixture lowered wild oat control versus MKH 6562 alone or other broadleaf mixtures.

Treatment
MKH 6562 tank mixed with dicamba mecoprop MCPA 1:1:4.4e0
Interactor
Wild oate0weed
Outcome
Wild oat controle0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
MKH 6562 applied alone or tank mixed with other broadleaf herbicidese0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–42
e0

“Wild oat control generally was lower for MKH 6562 tank mixed with dicamba mecoprop MCPA 1:1:4.4 and bromoxynil MCPA 1:1 compared with MKH 6562 applied alone or tank mixed with other broadleaf herbicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–890

Title

Control of Wild Oat (Avena fatua) in Wheat with MKH 65621

KEN J. KIRKLAND; ERIC N. JOHNSON; F. CRAIG STEVENSON Weed Technology 2001. doi:10.1614/0890-037x(2001)015[0048:cowoaf]2.0.co;2

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-12cee4f8fe6c1daa148076bdc2c6889e207d8b60197c9fab0810fc4f1692374f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

mecoprop · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

dicamba · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. no effect
  7. negative
See all 8 papers →

(4-chloro-2-methylphenoxy)acetic acid · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 7 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. negative
    MCPA controlled sunflower more slowly than bromoxynil or the combination.

    SUNFLOWER COMPETITION IN WHEAT · 1984 · compared with bromoxynil or bromoxynil plus MCPA

    Same direction

2 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.