Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Weed control method had no significant effect on cowpea yield performance.

A claim from Effect of Primextra and Intercropping on the Performance of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) in a Cowpea/Maize Intercrop · 2010

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed control method had no significant effect on cowpea yield performance.

Treatment
weed control methodse0
Outcome
yield performancese0
Direction
no significante0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was no significant (P = 0.05) effect of weed control methods on the growth and yield performances of cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–894

Title

Effect of Primextra and Intercropping on the Performance of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) in a Cowpea/Maize Intercrop

O. S. Olabode; G. O. Adesina International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Biotechnology 2010. doi:10.1021/ic9903782

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-14fc8675dc1597ea056a87bdee146fd6c5ee1b4b12edef93169c82e5543db945 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

herbicide · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

53 papers: 45 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim · 45 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

44 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.