Claim · model-written summary
Bayesian sister placement of Lamellocolea to Chiloscyphus lacks significant support.
- Taxon
- LamellocoleaLamellocoleae1
- Outcome
- position as sister to Chiloscyphuse0
- Qualifier
- lacks significant supporte0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValue
Verbatim
e0“its position as sister to Chiloscyphus obtained from the Bayesian analysis lacks significant support.”
e1“Lamellocolea is not included in either Chiloscyphus or Heteroscyphus in the trees derived from sequence data”
Title
J. J. Engel; X. L. He; D. Glenny Phytotaxa 2014. doi:10.11646/phytotaxa.9.1.6
Other claims from this paper (5)
- Observation Amphilophocolea is nested within Heteroscyphus.
- Observation Amphilophocolea specimens match Heteroscyphus knightii morphologically.
- Observation Heteroscyphus cymbaliferus is sister to the rest of the specified clade.
- Recommendation The authors suggest reinstating Tetracymbaliella.
- Observation Lamellocolea falls outside Chiloscyphus and Heteroscyphus in sequence trees.