Claim · model-written summary
Net soil organic carbon stock was favorable only under intercropping.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Verbatim
e0“The net soil organic carbon stock was favourable only for the cassava-groundnut intercrop.”
Title
Keiwoma M. Yila; Mohamed S. Lebbie; Abdul R. Conteh; et al. Agricultural Sciences 2023. doi:10.4236/as.2023.141006
Other claims from this paper (7)
- Intervention effect Intercropping lowered cassava above-ground biomass by 17% across locations without a significant cropping-system effect.
- Intervention effect Intercropping lowered cassava roots per plant by 11% across locations without a significant cropping-system effect.
- Intervention effect Intercropping lowered cassava fresh root yield by 17% across locations without a significant cropping-system effect.
- Intervention effect Intercropping raised the benefit-cost ratio by 121% against sole groundnut.
- Intervention effect Intercropping raised the benefit-cost ratio by 13% against sole cassava.
- Observation With 40% yield loss, only intercropping retained a favorable benefit-cost ratio of 1.12.
- Intervention effect Intercropping raised net soil organic carbon by 3.4% relative to baseline in 12 months.