Claim · model-written summary
Genotype by environment interactions generally did not occur.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0 - Material
- genotypee0
- Outcome
- genotype by environment interactionse0
- Direction
- do not existe0
Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“For sugar beet, genotype by environment interactions generally do not exist”
Title
D. Bloch; C. Hoffmann Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 2005. doi:10.1111/j.1439-037x.2005.00150.x
Other claims from this paper (11)
- Observation Genotypes differed significantly in taproot and leaf dry matter under stress and non-stress conditions.
- Observation Genotypes differed significantly in taproot sucrose, K, Na and α-amino nitrogen concentrations.
- Observation Genotypic differences were present by mid-June and changed little thereafter.
- Association Genotype did not interact with harvest date.
- Intervention effect Withholding irrigation during drought reduced leaf and taproot growth and the root-to-leaf ratio.
- Intervention effect Withholding irrigation during drought decreased the percentage of sucrose in dry matter.
- Intervention effect Withholding irrigation during drought caused α-amino N accumulation.
- Association Genotype did not interact with water supply for the studied parameters.
- Association Genotype-specific high α-amino N content did not improve drought adaptation.
- Association Leaf maintenance and taproot-to-leaf ratio during drought did not affect yield response.
- Recommendation The authors conclude that harvest date and regional climate need not guide variety selection.