Claim · model-written summary
Positive spacing difference was identified as the main factor affecting field planting uniformity.
Zea maysNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“increase of the positive difference of plant spacing is the major effect factor in the field planting uniformity”
t0“maize”
Title
Planting uniformity performance of motor-driven maize precision seeding systems
Shuo Yang; Changyuan Zhai; Yuanyuan Gao; et al. International journal of agricultural and biological engineering 2022. doi:10.25165/j.ijabe.20221505.5911
Other claims from this paper (13)
- Method / resource As laboratory speed rose, feed quality fell 16.79% for one planter.
- Method / resource As laboratory speed rose, feed quality fell 9.88% for the other planter.
- Method / resource Miss index rose 11.62% for one planter.
- Method / resource Miss index rose 9.70% for the other planter.
- Method / resource Average positive spacing difference increased linearly with forward speed for both planters.
- Method / resource Negative spacing difference had no linear correlation with forward speed.
- Method / resource The finger pick-up planter had 2.49 times as many positive as negative moving average points.
- Method / resource The air-suction planter had 4.49 times as many positive as negative moving average points.
- Method / resource The first planter had a maximum spacing coefficient of variation of 21.55%.
- Method / resource The second planter had a maximum spacing coefficient of variation of 20.66%.
- Method / resource The first planter had a peak spacing frequency at (24.69±0.63) cm.
- Method / resource The second planter had a peak spacing frequency at (25.63±0.32) cm.
- Method / resource The multiples index varied randomly with increasing speed.