Claim · model-written summary
Phorate alone did not significantly change thrips injury on peanut compared with co-application with the polymer.
- Taxon
- peanut
Arachis hypogaeae0 - Treatment
- phoratee1
- Outcome
- thrips injurye1
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede1
- Comparator
- their co-application with the polymere1
ThripsNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“applied in-furrow at planting for peanut production”
e1“neither imidacloprid nor phorate alone significantly varied with regard to stand count (P > 0.35), thrips injury (P > 0.27), tomato spotted wilt incidence (P > 0.08), or yield (P > 0.37) when compared to their co-application with the polymer”
Title
D.J. Anco; J.B. Hiers; Albert Cul Peanut Science 2023. doi:10.3146/0095-3679-501-ps22-16
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Intervention effect Imidacloprid alone did not significantly change peanut stand count compared with co-application with the polymer.
- Intervention effect Imidacloprid alone did not significantly change thrips injury on peanut compared with co-application with the polymer.
- Intervention effect Imidacloprid alone did not significantly change tomato spotted wilt incidence in peanut compared with co-application with the polymer.
- Intervention effect Imidacloprid alone did not significantly change peanut yield compared with co-application with the polymer.
- Intervention effect Phorate alone did not significantly change peanut stand count compared with co-application with the polymer.
- Intervention effect Phorate alone did not significantly change tomato spotted wilt incidence in peanut compared with co-application with the polymer.
- Intervention effect Phorate alone did not significantly change peanut yield compared with co-application with the polymer.
- Method / resource The fitted models were robust to the treatment composition of the screened studies.
- Intervention effect Where differences in projected returns above the nontreated check occurred, phorate or aldicarb were the most consistently profitable treatments.
- Observation Results were consistent across peanut variety susceptibility levels to tomato spotted wilt.