Claim · model-written summary
Canola or mustard productivity was occasionally greater on pea or lentil stubble than on mustard and wheat stubble.
- Taxon
- Canola or mustarde3
- Treatment
- pea or lentil stubblese3
- Outcome
- productivitye3
- Direction
- greatere3
- Qualifier
- occasionallye3
- Comparator
- mustard and wheat stubblese3
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue
Verbatim
e3“Canola or mustard productivity was occasionally greater when grown on pea or lentil stubbles compared with mustard and wheat stubbles”
Title
Pulse Crops for the Northern Great Plains
P. R. Miller; Y. Gan; B. G. McConkey; et al. Agronomy Journal 2003. doi:10.2134/agronj2003.9800
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Association Rotational benefits of pulse crops to wheat appeared more consistent on clay than on silt loam soil.
- Intervention effect Adjusting fertilizer N rates for the N contribution of the previous pulse crop effectively neutralized the benefits on wheat yield and protein relative to mustard.
- Mechanism The yield increase was attributed to increased available water.
- Intervention effect Under drier-than-normal conditions, pea yields were highest when grown on wheat stubble.
- Intervention effect Wheat productivity was least when grown on its own stubble.
- Intervention effect Pea and lentil benefitted most from being grown in wheat stubble.
- Intervention effect Pea and lentil provided rotational benefits to wheat, mustard and canola.
- Recommendation Pulse crops are a strong fit for diversified cropping systems on the semiarid northern Great Plains.