Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Direct sowing gave larger total and commercial production than the seedling treatments when all were harvested on the same date.

A claim from Relação entre produção de beterraba, Beta vulgaris var. conditiva, e diferentes métodos de plantio · 2008

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct sowing gave larger total and commercial production than the seedling treatments when all were harvested on the same date.

Taxon
Beta vulgaris var. conditivaBeta vulgarise0
Treatment
direct sowinge3
Outcome
total and commercial productione3
Direction
largere3
Comparator
bare-root seedlings and seedlings grown on 128, 200 and 288-cell trayse4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris
Beta vulgaris · TaxonMichael Bakker Paiva · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Beta vulgaris var. conditiva”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–138
e3

“When all treatments were harvested at the same date, direct sowing resulted in larger total and commercial production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–699
e4

“Treatments consisted of direct sowing, bare-root seedlings and seedlings grown on 128, 200 and 288-cell trays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–351

Title

Relação entre produção de beterraba, Beta vulgaris var. conditiva, e diferentes métodos de plantio

Horta, Andrea Carla Skraba; Santos, Humberto Silva; Scapim, Carlos Alberto; et al. LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) 2008. doi:10.4025/actasciagron.v23i0.2607

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-1ac4d8fe2d2b181c94f7e7cc80dc1db42aecab983f52603837e79cf1f7256192 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

transplanting · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 14 positive, 4 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.