Claim · model-written summary
The heteroscedastic MTME model had better fit and provided greater accuracy than the homoscedastic alternative among the two models fitted to eucalyptus clone data.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Verbatim
t0“eucalyptus clones”
e1“Of the two models, the heteroscedastic MTME model had better fit and provided greater accuracy”
e2“Two MTME models were fitted, for which residuals were considered homoscedastic and heteroscedastic”
Title
Multi-trait multi-environment models for selecting high-performance and stable eucalyptus clones
Filipe Manoel Ferreira; Saulo Fabrício da Silva Chaves; Marco Antônio Peixoto; et al. Acta Scientiarum Agronomy 2023. doi:10.4025/actasciagron.v45i1.61626
Other claims from this paper (6)
- Observation Genotype-by-environment interaction in the eucalyptus clones was complex.
- Observation Genetic correlation between DBH and pilodyn penetration in the eucalyptus clones was low.
- Observation Rank correlation between the clones selected by the MTME models was high for DBH.
- Observation Rank correlation between the clones selected by the MTME models was low for PP.
- Observation HMRPGV facilitated clone selection through simultaneous evaluation of stability, adaptability, and productivity.
- Recommendation The authors suggest the heteroscedastic MTME model with HMRPGV can be efficiently applied in genetic evaluation and selection of eucalyptus clones.