Observationmodel-written summary

Actellic Gold Chirindamatura Dust controlled both P. truncatus and S. zeamais, with 100% mortality across all populations tested.

A claim from Relative susceptibilities of different populations of Sitophilus zeamais and Prostephanus truncatus to currently registered grain protectants in Zimbabwe · 2019

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Actellic Gold Chirindamatura Dust controlled both P. truncatus and S. zeamais, with 100% mortality across all populations tested.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Actellic Gold Chirindamatura Dust®e6
Interactor
P. truncatusProstephanus truncatuse6pest
Second interactor
S. zeamaisSitophilus zeamaise6pest
Outcome
controle6
Value
100% mortalitiese6
Qualifier
across all populations testede6

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageComparatorSettingDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prostephanus truncatus
Prostephanus truncatus · InteractorSarah McCaffrey, Museum Victoria · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sitophilus zeamais
Sitophilus zeamais · Second interactorThis image was released by the Agricultural Research Service , the research agency of the United States Department of Agriculture , with the ID k3980-17 (next) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky and Prostephanus truncatus (Horn) are the two most destructive post-harvest insect pests of maize worldwide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–138
e6

“Actellic Gold Chirindamatura Dust® managed to control both P. truncatus and S. zeamais, achieving 100% mortalities across all populations tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1794–1938

Title

Relative susceptibilities of different populations of Sitophilus zeamais and Prostephanus truncatus to currently registered grain protectants in Zimbabwe

James Machingura Journal of Parasitology and Vector Biology 2019. doi:10.5897/jsppr2018.0241

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-1cec2d345da68fec9ebccd227a57b0eac5e3bc02c2d1338f3ebd425f5e07d018 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer