Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Phorate reduces stand count by 7% in 2001 but not in 2000.

A claim from Effect of Tillage System, Phorate, and Cultivar on Tomato Spotted Wilt of Peanut · 2003

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phorate reduces stand count by 7% in 2001 but not in 2000.

Treatment
Phoratee2
Outcome
stand counte2
Direction
lesse2
Value
7%e2
Qualifier
in 2001 but not in 2000e2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Spotted Wilt of Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–80
e2

“Phorate [O, O-diethyl,S-(ethylthio)methyl phosphorodithioate] treatment had 7% less stand count in 2001 but not in 2000”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–916

Title

Effect of Tillage System, Phorate, and Cultivar on Tomato Spotted Wilt of Peanut

J. J. Marois; D. L. Wright Agronomy Journal 2003. doi:10.2134/agronj2003.0386

Other claims from this paper (15)

Record rev-20bb389151ebd9024f4e01aca21b0d1697504c05dcbaf69f8935911ca75d0bd5 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

phorate · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.