Claim · model-written summary
Methods of sowing were statistically significant for the biological yield of wheat.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- methods of sowinge0
- Outcome
- biological yielde0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“on Weeds Controlling and Wheat Yield”
e0“methods of sowing were statistically significant for plant height, No. of grains spike-1, 1000-grain weight and biological yield”
Title
Study Effects of Planting Methods and Tank Mixed Herbiciedes on Weeds Controlling and Wheat Yield
Zoheir. Y. Ashrafi; Hamid. R. Mashhadi; Sedigheh Sadeghi; et al. Journal of Agricultural Science 2009. doi:10.5539/jas.v1n1p101
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Observation Methods of sowing were statistically significant for plant height, grains per spike and 1000-grain weight of wheat.
- Observation Tank-mixed herbicides were statistically significant for all wheat parameters investigated except grains per spike.
- Observation The interaction of planting methods with herbicides did not reach significance in any trait examined.
- Intervention effect Line sowing was the best planting method, followed by line plus broadcast sowing.
- Intervention effect Herbicide mixtures controlled mixed stands of broadleaf and grassy weeds by 65 to 74% in wheat.
- Intervention effect Herbicide mixtures increased wheat grain yield by 58-107%.
- Intervention effect Buctril-M + Topik 15 WP increased wheat yield by 107% over the weedy check.
- Intervention effect 2,4-D + Puma Super 75 EW increased wheat yield by 104% over the weedy check.
- Intervention effect Topik 15 WP increased wheat yield by 101% over the weedy check.