Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Cover crops in the short term did not contribute to yield and overall economic benefits.

A claim from Crop yield and economics of cropping systems involving different rotations, tillage, and cover crops · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cover crops in the short term did not contribute to yield and overall economic benefits.

Treatment: CCe1
Outcome: yield and overall economic benefitse1
Direction: did not contributee1

Not reportedTaxonMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

e1
“CC in its short term did not contribute to yield and overall economic benefits”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1261

Title

Crop yield and economics of cropping systems involving different rotations, tillage, and cover crops

J. Singh; T. Wang; S. Kumar; et al. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 2021. doi:10.2489/jswc.2021.00117

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect No-till reduced corn yield across all rotations compared with conventional tillage.
Intervention effect No-till increased soybean yield under two-year rotation compared with conventional tillage.
Intervention effect No-till improved the benefit-cost ratio compared with conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Three- and four-year rotations increased corn and soybean yields and associated profits compared with two-year rotations.
Intervention effect Diverse rotations compromised overall profitability because of lower profits of small grains.

Record rev-252f03a86000afa58d385800f1c31b54af24d500edb0f5a7d709d3b3f98ec083 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer