Claim · model-written summary
Within cultivar blocks, soil EC had some ability to indicate plant water status.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Verbatim
e0“In each cultivar block, soil EC showed some capability to be related to plant water status, and NDVI showed a relationship with yield.”
t0“vineyard soil and canopy vegetation”
Title
Runze Yu; Luca Brillante; Nazareth Torres; et al. OENO One 2021. doi:10.20870/oeno-one.2021.55.2.4598
Other claims from this paper (13)
- Observation NDVI and soil EC showed spatial patterns in the vineyard.
- Association Season-long stem water potential partly explained the NDVI spatial pattern.
- Observation Stem water potential was lowest in the CS block.
- Association Leaf photosynthesis did not follow the NDVI spatial pattern.
- Method / resource NDVI and soil EC poorly explained spatial variation in yield components.
- Method / resource NDVI and soil EC poorly explained spatial variation in berry chemistry.
- Method / resource PCA clearly discriminated three cultivars.
- Association Soil EC had a significant relationship with Ψstem integrals.
- Association Soil EC had a significant relationship with total skin anthocyanins.
- Association Soil EC had a significant relationship with tri- to di-hydroxylated flavonoids.
- Association Within cultivar blocks, NDVI related to yield.
- Mechanism Cultivar effects and uniform crop level management may weaken proximal sensing relations to physiology and berry chemistry.
- Method / resource Temporal proximal sensing can assess plant water status, primary metabolism, yield and berry secondary metabolism.