Claim · model-written summary
The assessment identified stable high, medium and low productivity zones and unstable zones.
- Taxon
- multi-crope0
- Outcome
- stable high, medium, low, and unstable yield productivity zonese1
- Comparator
- stable high, medium, low, and unstablee1
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Verbatim
e0“multi-crop framework”
e1“This resulted in the identification of stable high, medium, low, and unstable yield productivity zones.”
Title
Assessment of yield stability patterns using sentinel-2 over a 7-year period
Svetlana Košánová; Andrej Halabuk; Pavol Kenderessy; et al. Geocarto International 2025. doi:10.1080/10106049.2025.2532529
Other claims from this paper (5)
- Observation Stable high yielding zones occupied 6.5% of cropland.
- Observation Unstable yield zones occupied almost 47% of cropland.
- Observation The map showed fine-scale parcel variation and trends associated with climate and elevation gradients.
- Method / resource XGBoost distinguished stable high from low yield zones with AUC 0.86.
- Observation Elevation, topsoil reflectance, topography and field size were key predictors of the yield zone classes.