Claim · model-written summary
Rhizobium inoculation had small, inconsistent effects on chickpea.
- Taxon
- Chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- Rhizobium inoculatione0
- Outcome
- effectse0
RhizobiumNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The effects of Rhizobium inoculation were small and inconsistent”
t0“Chickpea”
Title
On-Farm Assessment of Improved Crop Production Practices in Northwest Syria. I. Chickpea
M. Pala; A. Mazid Experimental Agriculture 1992. doi:10.1017/s001447970001961x
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Intervention effect Early winter sowing substantially increased chickpea yield relative to spring or late winter sowing.
- Intervention effect Chemical weed control significantly increased grain yield against the unweeded control in winter-sown chickpea.
- Intervention effect Chemical weed control was less effective than hand weeding.
- Intervention effect Phosphate application significantly increased chickpea yield by 10% overall in the first three seasons.
- Intervention effect Drilling chickpea seed increased yield by 10% overall versus broadcast sowing.
- Observation The proposed practices singly or combined posed no economic or environmental risk to farmers.
- Intervention effect Combined early winter sowing, drilling, weeding and appropriate phosphate gave the greatest yield gains.
- Intervention effect The same combined practices gave the greatest net revenue gains.