Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Clodinafop controlled monocot weeds in wheat.

A claim from Integrated weed management in wheat with new molecules · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop controlled monocot weeds in wheat.

Treatment
clodinafope5
Outcome
controlled monocote5

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Integrated weed management in wheat with new molecules”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–54
e5

“The pre-emergence application of pendimethalin controlled monocot and dicot weeds, while clodinafop controlled monocot and metsulfuron-methyl controlled dicot weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–928

Title

Integrated weed management in wheat with new molecules

R. R. Pisal; B. K. Sagarka Indian Journal of Weed Science 2013

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-2c48d5129bf1ef98c80ccf8ea48a3a418571ee3ec6e8945d38be8386786c2585 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

clodinafop · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.