Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Overall seed quality showed no significant difference among irrigation times.

A claim from Optimizing drip irrigation managements to improve alfalfa seed yield in semiarid region · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Overall seed quality showed no significant difference among irrigation times.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
different irrigation time treatmentse0
Outcome
overall seed qualitye0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
different irrigation time treatmentse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no significant difference in overall seed quality among the different irrigation time treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1264–1360
t0

“alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–57

Title

Optimizing drip irrigation managements to improve alfalfa seed yield in semiarid region

Zhicheng Jia; Chengming Ou; Shoujiang Sun; et al. Agricultural Water Management 2024. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2024.108830

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-2d9c88010dfda5bd1357a8e0e2da99c8c1fc4013cd2ace6999f605c5950bb5a7 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

irrigation · quality: grain · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 6 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. negative
  8. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.