Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Intercrops with an additive design had stronger weed suppression than intercrops with a replacement design.

A claim from Annual intercropping suppresses weeds: A meta-analysis · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercrops with an additive design had stronger weed suppression than intercrops with a replacement design.

Taxon
annual arable intercropse0
Treatment
additive designe4
Outcome
weed suppressione4
Direction
strongere4
Comparator
a replacement designe4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“quantify the effect of intercropping on weed biomass in annual arable intercrops grown for their final product”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 348–458
e4

“Intercrops with an additive design had stronger weed suppression than intercrops with a replacement design. In the latter, a mixed arrangement gave stronger weed suppression than a row design, while spatial arrangement did not affect weed suppressive ability in additive designs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1521–1799

Title

Annual intercropping suppresses weeds: A meta-analysis

Chunfeng Gu; Lammert Bastiaans; Niels P.R. Anten; et al. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment 2021. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2021.107658

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-2fc9e2f5ba2db0bdd463405abde1605eab6da9024cca30fda665159f67184fe8 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer