Method / resourcemodel-written summary

The proportion of the absolute density estimated by drop-cloth or sweep-net samples was low (ca. 10-30%), with few exceptions such as Geocoris spp. nymphs.

A claim from Estimating Absolute Density from Relative Sampling of Lygus lineolaris (Heteroptera: Miridae) and Selected Predators in Early to Mid-season Cotton · 1985

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The proportion of the absolute density estimated by drop-cloth or sweep-net samples was low (ca. 10-30%), with few exceptions such as Geocoris spp. nymphs.

Outcome
the proportion of the absolute density estimated by drop-cloth or sweep-net samplese3
Direction
was lowe3
Value
ca. 10–30%e3
Qualifier
With few exceptions (notably Geocoris spp. nymphs)e3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“early to mid-season cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–232
e3

“With few exceptions (notably Geocoris spp. nymphs) the proportion of the absolute density estimated by drop-cloth or sweep-net samples was low (ca. 10–30%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–701

Title

Estimating Absolute Density from Relative Sampling of Lygus lineolaris (Heteroptera: Miridae) and Selected Predators in Early to Mid-season Cotton

S. J. Fleischer; M. J. Gaylor; J. V. Edelson Environmental Entomology 1985. doi:10.1093/ee/14.6.709

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-30b1af8bf5bdce3d714cb62f103c2689d6db6b4172e68ae68b4e641abf7b6e12 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer