Claim · model-written summary
Variety pairs c and i and l and m had 100% genetic similarity.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Material
- var. c and i and l and me0
- Outcome
- similaritiese0
- Value
- 100%e0
Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“two pairs of varieties (var. c and i and l and m) showing 100% similarities”
t0“tomato”
Title
Ezekiel; Nwangburuka; Ajibade; et al. AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY 2011. doi:10.5897/ajb11.144
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Observation Fourteen tomato varietal groups were differentiated by morphology.
- Observation Of 74 RAPD amplified products, 62.2% were polymorphic.
- Observation OPB-18 had the highest polymorphism at 83.3%.
- Observation OPU-14 had the least polymorphism at 44.4%.
- Observation The tomato variety dendrogram contained three clusters.
- Observation Genotypic relationships within clusters ranged from 2 in clusters 1 and 3 to 10 in cluster 2.
- Observation Cluster 2 had four subgroups.
- Method / resource Local names, cultivation place and phenotype were unsuitable for varietal differentiation because phenotypically different fruits were genetically related.
- Observation Tomato varieties from the same geographic zone were not necessarily genetically similar.