Claim · model-written summary
Yield components under conservation tillage did not differ significantly from traditional tillage.
- Taxon
- WINTER WHEAT
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- soil conservation tillage systemse0
- Outcome
- Yield componentse0
- Direction
- did not differe0
- Comparator
- traditional systeme0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Yield components recorded for soil conservation tillage systems (CS, DS, and NT) did not differ significantly from those evaluated for traditional system (TS)”
t0“WINTER WHEAT”
Title
Alexandru I. Cociu Romanian Agricultural Research 2011
Other claims from this paper (7)
- Intervention effect Chisel tillage increased soil water at seeding relative to traditional tillage by 0.8%.
- Intervention effect Disc/sweep tillage increased soil water at seeding by 3.9%.
- Intervention effect No tillage increased soil water at seeding by 4.1%.
- Intervention effect Soil water at harvest was 1.3% higher under chisel tillage than traditional tillage.
- Intervention effect Soil water at harvest was 2.5% higher under no tillage than traditional tillage.
- Intervention effect All conservation tillage systems produced significantly greater economic outputs than traditional tillage.
- Recommendation The authors urge farmers in the South Plain of Romania to adopt soil conservation tillage systems.